ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019
Use of a Qualification Phantom for PET Brain Imaging in a Multicenter Consortium: A Collaboration Between the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium and the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data-Driven Image-Based Protocol for Brain PET Image Harmonization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physical phantom validation of clustering-initiated factorization in dynamic PET.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Preliminary protocol for measuring the reproducibility and accuracy of flow values on digital PET/CT systems in [EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Investigation of the effectiveness of no-reference metric in image evaluation in nuclear medicine.PloS one · 2024Article
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and quantitative brain PET across a multicenter consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.