Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530664›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Sex-specific phenotypes of histone H4 point mutants establish dosage compensation as the critical function of H4K16 acetylation in

Ömer Copur, Andrey Gorchakov, Katja Finkl, Mitzi I Kuroda, Jürg Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Genes & development · 2024
    Article
  10. Set2 and H3K36 regulate thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Dosage Compensation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ömer CopurLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Andrey GorchakovDivision of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Katja FinklLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Mitzi I KurodaDivision of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; mkuroda@genetics.med.harvard.edu muellerj@biochem.mpg.de.
Jürg MüllerLaboratory of Chromatin Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany; mkuroda@genetics.med.harvard.edu muellerj@biochem.mpg.de.

Funding

Epigenetic regulation of transcriptional programmingR35GM126944 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KURODA, MITZI I · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylation of histone H4 at lysine 16 (H4K16) modulates nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and directly affects nucleosome binding by certain proteins. In

Indexed as

AcetylationAnimalsDosage Compensation, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleHistone AcetyltransferasesHistonesLysineMaleNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesPhenotypePoint MutationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSexDrosophila ProteinsHistone AcetyltransferasesHistonesLysineNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesTranscription Factorschromatindosage compensation complexDrosophilaH4K16 acetylationhistone modification

Identifiers

PMID30530664
PMCPMC6310812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.