Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530657›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2019

Survival among Veterans Obtaining Dialysis in VA and Non-VA Settings.

Virginia Wang, Cynthia J Coffman, Karen M Stechuchak, Theodore S Z Berkowitz, Paul L Hebert, David Edelman, Ann M O'Hare, Susan T Crowley, Hollis J Weidenbacher, Matthew L Maciejewski

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers and Opportunities in Access to Peritoneal Dialysis across Veterans Health Administration.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. VA-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Program Feasibility Considerations and Process Outline.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medication Reconciliation: The Foundation of Medication Safety for Patients Requiring Dialysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020
    Review
  11. Authors' Reply.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Virginia WangHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; virginia.wang@va.gov.
Cynthia J CoffmanHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Karen M StechuchakHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Theodore S Z BerkowitzHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Paul L HebertCenter for Health Services Research in Older Adults, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
David EdelmanHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Ann M O'HareCenter for Health Services Research in Older Adults, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Susan T CrowleyRenal Section, Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, Connecticut; and.
Hollis J WeidenbacherHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew L MaciejewskiHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

HSRD VA CIN 13-410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes of veterans with ESRD may differ depending on where they receive dialysis and who finances this care, but little is known about variation in outcomes across different dialysis settings and financial arrangements.

methodsWe examined survival among 27,241 Veterans Affairs (VA)-enrolled veterans who initiated chronic dialysis in 2008-2011 at (

resultsOverall, 4% of patients received dialysis in VA, 11% under VA-PC, 67% under Medicare, and 18% in dual settings (nearly half receiving dual VA and VA-PC dialysis). Crude 2-year mortality was 25% for veterans receiving dialysis in the VA, 30% under VA-PC, 42% under Medicare, and 23% in dual settings. After adjustment, dialysis patients in VA or in dual settings had significantly lower 2-year mortality than those under Medicare; mortality did not differ in VA-PC and Medicare dialysis settings.

conclusionsMortality rates were highest for veterans receiving dialysis in Medicare or VA-PC settings and lowest for veterans receiving dialysis in the VA or dual settings. These findings inform institutional decisions about provision of dialysis for veterans. Further research identifying processes associated with improved survival for patients receiving VA-based dialysis may be useful in establishing best practices for outsourced veteran care.

Indexed as

Hospitals, CommunityHospitals, VeteransAgedCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPrognosisRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysiscommunity caredialysisend-stage renal diseaseMedicaremortalityVeterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID30530657
PMCPMC6317601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.