Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530473›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Metabolomics for predicting fetal growth restriction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Debora Farias Batista Leite, Aude-Claire Morillon, Elias F Melo Júnior, Renato T Souza, Ali S Khashan, Philip N Baker, Louise C Kenny, José Guilherme Cecatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. New Approaches to Fetal Growth Restriction: The Time for Metabolomics Has Come.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Debora Farias Batista LeiteDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Clinics Hospital of Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8839-3934
Aude-Claire MorillonIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Elias F Melo JúniorDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Clinics Hospital of Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ali S KhashanIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Philip N BakerCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Louise C KennyIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
José Guilherme CecattiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-8445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFetal growth restriction (FGR) is a relevant research and clinical concern since it is related to higher risks of adverse outcomes at any period of life. Current predictive tools in pregnancy (clinical factors, ultrasound scan, placenta-related biomarkers) fail to identify the true growth-restricted fetus. However, technologies based on metabolomics have generated interesting findings and seem promising. In this systematic review, we will address diagnostic accuracy of metabolomics analyses in predicting FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our primary outcome is small for gestational age infant, as a surrogate for FGR, defined as birth weight below the 10th centile by customised or population-based curves for gestational age. A detailed systematic literature search will be carried in electronic databases and conference abstracts, using the keywords 'fetal growth retardation', 'metabolomics', 'pregnancy' and 'screening' (and their variations). We will include original peer-reviewed articles published from 1998 to 2018, involving pregnancies of fetuses without congenital malformations; sample collection must have been performed before clinical recognition of growth impairment. If additional information is required, authors will be contacted. Reviews, case reports, cross-sectional studies, non-human research and commentaries papers will be excluded. Sample characteristics and the diagnostic accuracy data will be retrieved and analysed. If data allows, we will perform a meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this is a systematic review, no ethical approval is necessary. This protocol will be publicised in our institutional websites and results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089985.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMetabolomicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMeta-Analysis as TopicPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topicfetal growth restrictionintrauterine growth restrictionmetabolomicspredictionsmall for gestational age infant

Identifiers

PMID30530473
PMCPMC6286473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.