ArticleBMJ open2018
Development and evaluation of a WeChat-based life review programme for patients with cancer: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of a WeChat-Based Life Review Program for Patients With Digestive System Cancer: 3-Arm Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- New Path to Recovery and Well-Being: Cross-Sectional Study on WeChat Use and Endorsement of WeChat-Based mHealth Among People Living With Schizophrenia in China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Developing and Testing an Online Portal for Virtual Navigation for Asian American Patients With Cancer: Pilot Feasibility Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Analysis of "Dr Ding Xiang" on WeChat in China to Determine Factors Influencing Readership on Medical Social Media: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- The prognostic role of WeChat-based instant doctor-patient communication in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Patient COUNTS: A pilot navigation program for Asian American cancer patients.Asian American journal of psychology · 2024Article
- Effects of Wuxi CDC WeChat official account article features on user engagement in health promotion.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Family-oriented dignity therapy for patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: How does it work better?Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Addressing Disparities in Cancer Screening among U.S. Immigrants: Progress and Opportunities.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with cancer often suffer from considerable distress. Life review is a process of recalling, evaluating and integrating life experiences to alleviate a sense of despair and achieve self-integrity. Empirical data have supported the fact that life review is an effective psychological intervention, but it is not always accessible to patients with cancer. There is little evidence of internet-based life review programmes tailored to patients with cancer. This study aims to develop a WeChat-based life review programme and evaluate its effectiveness on the psycho-spiritual well-being of patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre randomised parallel group superiority design will be used. Patients with cancer will be randomised, to either a control group, or to an experimental group receiving a 6-week WeChat-based life review programme. The programme, which was mainly developed based on Erikson's psycho-social development theory and Reed's self-transcendence theory, provides synchronous and asynchronous communication modes for patients to review their life. The former is real-time communication, providing an e-life review interview guided by a facilitator online. The latter is not simultaneously dialogic and is used to interact with patients before and after a life review interview through Memory Prompts, Review Extraction, Mind Space and E-legacy products. The primary outcomes include anxiety, depression and self-transcendence, and the secondary outcomes are meaning in life and hope. These will be measured at baseline, and immediately, at 3 months, and at 6 months after the programme's conclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Biological and Medical Research Ethics Committee of the corresponding author's university (IRB Ref No: 2016/00020). The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IOR-17011998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.