Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530461›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2018

Computer-Aided Telephone Support for Primary Care Patients with Common Mental Health Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Salaha Zaheer, Vanessa Garofalo, David Rodie, Athina Perivolaris, Jenny Chum, Allison Crawford, Rose Geist, Andrea Levinson, Brian Mitchell, David Oslin and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02345122 (CAMH PARTNERs), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02345122 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

CAMH PARTNERs: Integrated Care for Better Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2014 to 2026Enrolled635ConditionsDepression, Anxiety, Alcohol DrinkingArmsIntervention: Mental Health Technician, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Action at a Distance: Geriatric Research during a Pandemic.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Salaha ZaheerGeriatric Mental Health Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-0011
Vanessa GarofaloGeriatric Mental Health Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-6827
David RodieCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8788-1653
Athina PerivolarisCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-7626
Jenny ChumGeriatric Mental Health Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-223X
Allison CrawfordCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-0664
Rose GeistDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-5979
Andrea LevinsonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-1992
Brian MitchellGroup Health Centre, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-4466
David OslinUniversity of Pennsylvania and the Department of Veteran Affairs, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4392-4599
Nadiya SunderjiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-0658
Benoit H MulsantCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0303-6450
PARTNERs Study Group *Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression, anxiety, and at-risk drinking are highly prevalent in primary care settings. Many jurisdictions experience geographical barriers to accessing mental health services, necessitating the development and validation of alternative models of care delivery. Existing evidence supports the acceptability and effectiveness of providing mental health care by telephone.

objectiveThis analysis assesses patient's acceptability of computer-aided telephone support delivered by lay providers to primary care patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking.

methodsThe Primary care Assessment and Research of a Telephone intervention for Neuropsychiatric conditions with Education and Resources study is a randomized controlled trial comparing a computer-aided telephone-based intervention to usual care enhanced by periodic assessments in adult primary care patients referred for the treatment of depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking; no part of the study involves in-person contact. For this analysis, the following data were obtained: reasons provided for declining consent; reasons provided for withdrawing from the study; study retention rate; and a thematic analysis of a satisfaction survey upon study completion.

resultsDuring the consent process, 17.1% (114/667) patients referred to the study declined to participate and 57.0% of them (65/114) attributed their refusal to research-related factors (ie, randomization and time commitment); a further 16.7% (19/114) declined owing to the telephone delivery of the intervention. Among the 377 participants who were randomized to the 1-year intervention, the overall retention rate was 82.8% (312/377). Almost no participants who withdrew from the study identified the telephone components of the study as their reason for withdrawal. Analysis of a qualitative satisfaction survey revealed that 97% (38/39) of comments related to the telephone components were positive with key reported positive attributes being accessibility, convenience, and privacy.

conclusionsOur results suggest that a computer-aided telephone support is highly acceptable to primary care patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking. In particular, these patients appreciate its accessibility, flexibility, and privacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02345122; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02345122 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73R9Q2cle).

Indexed as

anxietyat-risk drinkingcollaborative caredepressionfamily medicinegeneral practicelay providerprimary care psychiatrytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30530461
PMCPMC6305875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.