Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530326›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2019

Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Keith A Wear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hydrophone Measurements for Biomedical Ultrasound Applications: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Review
  2. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Article
  10. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2020
    Article
  11. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keith A Wear

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatiotemporal transfer function for a needle or reflectance-based fiber-optic hydrophone is modeled as separable into the product of two filters corresponding to frequency-dependent sensitivity and spatial averaging. The separable hydrophone transfer function model is verified numerically by comparison to a more general rigid piston spatiotemporal response model that does not assume separability. Spatial averaging effects are characterized by frequency-dependent "effective" sensitive element diameter, which can be more than double the geometrical sensitive element diameter. The transfer function is tested in simulation using a nonlinear focused pressure wave model based on Gaussian harmonic radial pressure distributions. The pressure wave model is validated by comparing to experimental hydrophone scans of nonlinear beams produced by three source transducers. An analytic form for the spatial averaging filter, applicable to Gaussian harmonic beams, is derived. A second analytic form for the spatial averaging filter, applicable to quadratic harmonic beams, is derived by extending the spatial averaging correction recommended by IEC 62127-1 Annex E to nonlinear signals with multiple harmonics. Both forms are applicable to all hydrophones (not just needle and fiber-optic hydrophones). Simulation analysis performed for a wide variety of transducer geometries indicates that the Gaussian spatial averaging filter formula is more accurate than the quadratic formula over a wider range of harmonics. Additional experimental validation is provided in Part II. Readers who are uninterested in hydrophone theory may skip the theoretical and experimental sections of this paper and proceed to the graphical guide for practical information to inform and support selection of hydrophone sensitive element size (but might be well advised to read the Introduction).

Indexed as

AcousticsFiber Optic TechnologyModels, TheoreticalNormal DistributionSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTransducers

Identifiers

PMID30530326
PMCPMC6935508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.