Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530320›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019

Toward Electrical Impedance Tomography Coupled Ultrasound Imaging for Assessing Muscle Health.

Ethan K Murphy, Joseph Skinner, Maria Martucci, Seward B Rutkove, Ryan J Halter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Review of Recent Advancements in Sensor-Integrated Medical Tools.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. ACT5 Electrical Impedance Tomography System.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan K Murphy
Joseph Skinner
Maria Martucci
Seward B Rutkove
Ryan J Halter

Funding

Innovative Ultrasound Technology in Neuromuscular DiseaseK24NS060951 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
Intraoperative Surgical Margin Assessment with Electrical Impedance SpectroscopyR01CA143020 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HALTER, RYAN JOSEPH · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143020NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS060951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper establishes for the first time that a coupled ultrasound (US) and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system can serve as a non-invasive, spatially localized approach to extract clinically relevant muscle properties. The US/EIT system represents a potential enhancement to electrical impedance myography (EIM), which has shown promise as a non-invasive technology that may have important clinical use in indicating neuromuscular disease status and as a diagnostic tool. A 2.5D EIT algorithm evaluated on simulation, measured phantoms, and measured patient data was studied to evaluate US/EIT's ability to distinguish different aspects of muscle tissue. Simulated and phantom experiments revealed the depths of distinguishability of 3.2 and 4.2 mm in simulation for 10% and 20% changes in muscle properties, respectively, and 3.6 mm in measured phantom experiments assuming a 12% muscle conductivity change. Reconstructions from the patient data established that there were consistent differences 1) between longitudinal (along) and transverse (across) muscle conductivity reconstructions at frequencies of 40 and 80 kHz and 2) side-by-side comparison between healthy and diseased tissue in terms of conductivity, permittivity, and phase at 40 and 80 kHz. Comparisons were made between the EIT reconstructed values and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements (an available surrogate in place of standard EIM measurements) made with the US/EIT system, wherein 1) EIS and EIT show similar sensitivity to longitudinal and transverse differences and 2) EIT showed a more consistent ability to differentiate healthy and diseased tissue. These results suggest that US/EIT appears very promising for non-invasive and spatially localized diagnosis of muscle health.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceAdipose TissueAgedAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPhantoms, ImagingTomographyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30530320
PMCPMC6668036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.