ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
Connectome Smoothing via Low-Rank Approximations.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Homeodynamic feedback inhibition control in whole-brain simulations.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A Principled Framework to Assess the Information-Theoretic Fitness of Brain Functional Sub-Circuits.Mathematics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A principled framework to assess the information-theoretic fitness of brain functional sub-circuits.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Exploiting node metadata to predict interactions in bipartite networks using graph embedding and neural networks.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- The Importance of Being Correlated: Implications of Dependence in Joint Spectral Inference across Multiple Networks.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2022Article
- Inference for Multiple Heterogeneous Networks with a Common Invariant Subspace.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In brain imaging and connectomics, the study of brain networks, estimating the mean of a population of graphs based on a sample is a core problem. Often, this problem is especially difficult because the sample or cohort size is relatively small, sometimes even a single subject, while the number of nodes can be very large with noisy estimates of connectivity. While the element-wise sample mean of the adjacency matrices is a common approach, this method does not exploit the underlying structural properties of the graphs. We propose using a low-rank method that incorporates dimension selection and diagonal augmentation to smooth the estimates and improve performance over the naïve methodology for small sample sizes. Theoretical results for the stochastic block model show that this method offers major improvements when there are many vertices. Similarly, we demonstrate that the low-rank methods outperform the standard sample mean for a variety of independent edge distributions as well as human connectome data derived from the magnetic resonance imaging, especially when the sample sizes are small. Moreover, the low-rank methods yield "eigen-connectomes," which correlate with the lobe-structure of the human brain and superstructures of the mouse brain. These results indicate that the low-rank methods are the important parts of the toolbox for researchers studying populations of graphs in general and statistical connectomics in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.