Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30530307›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2019

Individualization of Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis.

Rammah Abohtyra, Yossi Chait, Michael J Germain, Christopher V Hollot, Joseph Horowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rammah Abohtyra
Yossi Chait
Michael J Germain
Christopher V Hollot
Joseph Horowitz

Funding

The Engineering of Individualized Anemia Management ProtocolsK25DK096006 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI CHAIT, YOSSI · 2013 to 2016
$670k
NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK096006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are approximately 660 000 end-stage renal disease patients in the USA, with hemodialysis (HD) the primary form of treatment. High ultrafiltration rates (UFRs) are associated with intradialytic hypotension, a complication associated with adverse clinical outcomes including mortality. Individualized UFR profiles could reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.

methodsThe patient's fluid dynamics during HD is described by a nonlinear model comprising intravascular and interstitial pools, whose parameters are given by the patient's estimated nominal parameter values with uncertainty ranges; the output measurement is hematocrit. We design UFR profiles that minimize the maximal UFR needed to remove a prescribed volume of fluid within a set time, with hematocrit not exceeding a specified time-varying critical profile.

resultsWe present a novel approach to design individualized UFR profiles, and give theoretical results guaranteeing that the system remains within a predefined physiologically plausible region and does not exceed a specified time-invariant critical hematocrit level for all parameters in the uncertainty ranges. We test the performance of our design using a real patient data example. The designed UFR maintains the system below a time-varying critical hematocrit profile in the example.

conclusionTheoretical results and simulations show that our designed UFR profiles can remove the target amount of fluid in a given time period while keeping the hematocrit below a specified critical profile. SIGNIFICANCE: Individualization of UFR profiles is now feasible using current HD technology and may reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicUltrafiltrationAlgorithmsHumansNonlinear DynamicsPrecision MedicineRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID30530307
PMCPMC6691497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.