ArticleBrain research bulletin2019
Computing neurite outgrowth and arborization in superior cervical ganglion neurons.
Article in Brain research bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuropathy-Associated HSPB1 Mutant Impairs Neuronal Mechanoadaptation and Axonal Regeneration.Cells · 2026Article
- Nuclear Translocation of IGF1R Induces Cell Cycle Re-entry via Cyclin D1 Regulation in an Aβ-Driven Alzheimer's Disease Model.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- TGF-β1 Improves Nerve Regeneration and Functional Recovery After Sciatic Nerve Injury by Alleviating Inflammation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Label-Free Visualization and Morphological Profiling of Neuronal Differentiation and Axonal Degeneration through Quantitative Phase Imaging.Advanced biology · 2024Article
- Semiautomated and Automated Quantitative Analysis of Corneal Sub-Basal Nerves in Patients With DED With Ocular Pain Using IVCM.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons.Neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Effects of classical PKC activation on hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive performance: mechanism of action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Three-Dimensional Otic Neuronal Progenitor Spheroids Derived from Human Embryonic Stem Cells.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2021Article
- Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Changes in Cytoskeleton.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dendrites are the primary site of synaptic activity in neurons and changes in synapses are often the first pathological stage in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecular studies of these changes rely on morphological analysis of the imaging of somas and dendritic arbors of cultured or primary neurons. As research on preventing or reversing synaptic degeneration develops, demands increase for user-friendly 2D neurite analyzers without undermining accuracy and reproducibility. The most common method of 2D neurite analysis is manual by using ImageJ. This method relies completely on the user's ability to distinguish the shape and size of dendrites and trace morphology with a series of straight connected lines. Semi-automatic methods have also been developed, such as the NeuronJ plugin for ImageJ. These methods still rely on the user to identify the start and end of the dendrites, but automatically determine the shape, reducing the likelihood of user bias and speeding the process. Some automatic methods have been developed through image processing software, like ImagePro. These programs tend to be expensive, but have been shown to be fast and effective, limiting user interaction. In this study, we compare three methods of neurite analysis-ImageJ, NeuronJ, and ImagePro-in measuring the soma size, number of dendrites, and length of dendrites per cell of embryonic sympathetic rat neurons with BMP-7-induced dendritic growth. Our results indicate that ImageJ and NeuronJ measurements were of similar effectiveness and consistent throughout various images and multiple trials. NeuronJ required less user interaction in measuring the length of dendrites than the manual method and therefore, was faster and less labor intensive. Conversely, ImagePro tended to be inconsistent across images, overestimating both soma size and the number of dendrites per cell while underestimating the length of dendrites. Overall, NeuronJ, in conjunction with ImageJ, is the most reliable and efficient method of 2D neurite analysis tested in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.