Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30529562›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2019

Computing neurite outgrowth and arborization in superior cervical ganglion neurons.

Rachel Henley, Vidya Chandrasekaran, Cecilia Giulivi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of classical PKC activation on hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive performance: mechanism of action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Changes in Cytoskeleton.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel HenleyDepartment of Biology, Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, CA, 94575, United States.
Vidya ChandrasekaranDepartment of Biology, Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, CA, 94575, United States.
Cecilia GiuliviDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States; Medical Investigations of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute, University of California Davis, CA 95817, United States. Electronic address: cgiulivi@ucdavis.edu.
Saint Mary's College of California · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

Influence of Prenatal Folate on Placental mtDNA and Autism RiskR21HD086769 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GIULIVI, CECILIA, SCHMIDT, REBECCA JEAN · 2016 to 2017
$431k
Antioxidants and oxidative damage in mitochondriaR01ES012691 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI GIULIVI, CECILIA · 2004 to 2004
$148k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086769NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendrites are the primary site of synaptic activity in neurons and changes in synapses are often the first pathological stage in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecular studies of these changes rely on morphological analysis of the imaging of somas and dendritic arbors of cultured or primary neurons. As research on preventing or reversing synaptic degeneration develops, demands increase for user-friendly 2D neurite analyzers without undermining accuracy and reproducibility. The most common method of 2D neurite analysis is manual by using ImageJ. This method relies completely on the user's ability to distinguish the shape and size of dendrites and trace morphology with a series of straight connected lines. Semi-automatic methods have also been developed, such as the NeuronJ plugin for ImageJ. These methods still rely on the user to identify the start and end of the dendrites, but automatically determine the shape, reducing the likelihood of user bias and speeding the process. Some automatic methods have been developed through image processing software, like ImagePro. These programs tend to be expensive, but have been shown to be fast and effective, limiting user interaction. In this study, we compare three methods of neurite analysis-ImageJ, NeuronJ, and ImagePro-in measuring the soma size, number of dendrites, and length of dendrites per cell of embryonic sympathetic rat neurons with BMP-7-induced dendritic growth. Our results indicate that ImageJ and NeuronJ measurements were of similar effectiveness and consistent throughout various images and multiple trials. NeuronJ required less user interaction in measuring the length of dendrites than the manual method and therefore, was faster and less labor intensive. Conversely, ImagePro tended to be inconsistent across images, overestimating both soma size and the number of dendrites per cell while underestimating the length of dendrites. Overall, NeuronJ, in conjunction with ImageJ, is the most reliable and efficient method of 2D neurite analysis tested in the present study.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuritesNeuronal OutgrowthNeuronsPrimary Cell CultureRatsReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareSuperior Cervical GanglionAutomatic neurite tracingDendritic growthFluorescent microscopyMethod validationNeurite tracingSympathetic neurons

Identifiers

PMID30529562
PMCPMC6994235
OpenAlexW2904815861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.