ArticleFree radical biology & medicine2019
Drosophila methionine sulfoxide reductase A (MSRA) lacks methionine oxidase activity.
Article in Free radical biology & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ndufaf2, a protein in mitochondrial complex I, interactsRedox report : communications in free radical research · 2023Article
- Catechin Mediates Ferroptosis to Exert an Anti-Inflammatory Effect on RAW 264.7 Cells.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Loss of methionine sulfoxide reductases increases resistance to oxidative stress.Free radical biology & medicine · 2019Article
- Cytoplasmic and Mitochondrial NADPH-Coupled Redox Systems in the Regulation of Aging.Nutrients · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mouse, human, and E. coli methionine sulfoxide reductase A (MSRA) stereospecifically catalyze both the reduction of S-methionine sulfoxide to methionine and the oxidation of methionine to S-methionine sulfoxide. Calmodulin has 9 methionine residues, but only Met77 is oxidized by MSRA, and this is completely reversed when MSRA operates in the reductase direction. Given the powerful genetic tools available for Drosophila, we selected this model organism to identify the in vivo calmodulin targets regulated by redox modulation of Met77. The active site sequences of mammalian and Drosophila MSRA are identical, and both contain two cysteine residues in their carboxy terminal domains. We produced recombinant Drosophila MSRA and studied its biochemical and biophysical properties. The enzyme is active as a methionine sulfoxide reductase, but it cannot function as a methionine oxidase. The first step in the mammalian oxidase reaction is formation of a sulfenic acid at the active site, and the second step is the reaction of the sulfenic acid with a carboxy terminal domain cysteine to form a disulfide bond. The third step regenerates the active site through a disulfide exchange reaction with a second carboxy terminal domain cysteine. Drosophila MSRA carries out the first and second steps, but it cannot regenerate the active site in the third step. Thus, unlike the E. coli and mammalian enzymes, Drosophila MSRA catalyzes only the reduction of methionine sulfoxide and not the oxidation of methionine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.