Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30528965›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2019

Mapping Structure-Function Relationships in the Brain.

Abraham Z Snyder, Adam Q Bauer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hemodynamic transient and functional connectivity follow structural connectivity and cell type over the brain hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abraham Z SnyderDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Adam Q BauerDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: aqbauer@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

IMAGING COREP01NS080675 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, ABRAHAM ZVI · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HERSHEY, TAMARA G, MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
OPTOGENETIC MAPPING OF CELL SPECIFIC CONNECTIONS IN THE MOUSE BRAIN AFTER STROKER01NS102870 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAUER, ADAM Q · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
MECHANISMS OF FUNCTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL RECOVERY FOLLOWING ISCHEMIC STROKEK25NS083754 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAUER, ADAM Q · 2014 to 2018
$756k
NINDS NIH HHS K25 NS083754NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS080675NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping the structural and functional connectivity of the brain is a major focus of systems neuroscience research and will help to identify causally important changes in neural circuitry responsible for behavioral dysfunction. Several methods for examining brain activity in humans have been extended to rodent and monkey models in which molecular and genetic manipulations exist for linking to human disease. In this review, which is part of a special issue focused on bridging brain connectivity information across species and spatiotemporal scales, we address mapping brain activity and neural connectivity in rodents using optogenetics in conjunction with either functional magnetic resonance imaging or optical intrinsic signal imaging. We chose to focus on these techniques because they are capable of reporting spontaneous or evoked hemodynamic activity most closely linked to human neuroimaging studies. We discuss the capabilities and limitations of blood-based imaging methods, usage of optogenetic techniques to map neural systems in rodent models, and other powerful mapping techniques for examining neural connectivity over different spatial and temporal scales. We also discuss implementing strategies for mapping brain connectivity in humans with both basic and clinical applications, and conclude with how cross-species mapping studies can be utilized to influence preclinical imaging studies and clinical practices alike.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingHumansEffective connectivityFunctional connectivityFunctional neuroimagingOptogeneticsStructural connectivityTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30528965
PMCPMC6488459
OpenAlexW2898821345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.