ArticleUrology2019
Factors Associated With the Highest and Lowest Cited Research Articles in Urology Journals.
Article in Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Citation Velocity and Social Media Impact Analysis of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Randomized Controlled Trials.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Looking at the dark side: A bibliometric study on uncited and poorly cited articles in orthodontic research.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Evaluating the Highest- and Lowest-cited Research Articles in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Literature.The Journal of surgical research · 2021Article
- Differences in Highly-Cited and Lowly-Cited Manuscripts in Plastic Surgery.The Journal of surgical research · 2020Article
- Factors Associated with Low and High Article Citations in Four Prominent Orthopaedic Surgery Journals.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Factors Associated With the Highest and Lowest Cited Research Articles in General Surgery Journals.The Journal of surgical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine what factors of published urology research articles are associated with future citations.
methodsWe identified all primary research articles published between 1997 and 2007 in Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology International, Urology, and European Urology. Only 50 articles in this period had accrued 0 or 1 citation in a 10-year period following publication. We compared the characteristics of the articles in the low citation cohort to the 50 articles with the highest number of citations from the same journals and time period. Student's t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the data with predetermined level of significance set to P < .05.
resultsThere were many significant differences between the 2 cohorts. When compared to the cohort of articles with 0 or 1 citation, highly cited articles were significantly more likely to be a clinical study, multi-institutional and multinational effort, and related to the field of urologic oncology. They were also significantly more likely to have a larger sample size, a statistically significant primary finding, more authors, more references, and more tables, as well as longer title, abstract, and overall manuscript word counts.
conclusionVery few articles published in the major urology journals accrued 0 or 1 citation over a 10-year period. This suggests that the vast majority of articles selected for publication are used for further future research. Nevertheless, there were distinct differences between the 2 cohorts, showing that certain factors are associated with articles being cited more frequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.