Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019
Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Agomelatine in the Prevention of Poststroke Depression
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 280 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding by specific SSRIs and SNRIs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of antidepressants on motor and functional recovery in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on stroke outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- The reporting of health systems data use in primary results publications of clinical trials: a systematic review.Trials · 2025Pooled it
- Individual patient data meta-analysis of the effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Pooled it
- The antidepressive mechanism of Longya Lilium combined with Fluoxetine in mice with depression-like behaviors.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Search and Review of Registered Pharmacological Therapies Investigated to Improve Outcomes after a Stroke.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological, non-invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for treating depression after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- Brazilian practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: Part II.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Guideline
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Tolerability of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Motor Recovery in Non-depressed Patients After Acute Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Is Fluoxetine Good for Subacute Stroke? A Meta-Analysis Evidenced From Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacological, psychological and non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for preventing depression after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Recovery Stage of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2020Pooled it
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Neuronal Stem Cell and Drug Interactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Concise Review.Stem cells translational medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Sihogayonggolmoryeo-tang (Saikokaryukotsuboreito, Chai-Hu-Jia-Long-Gu-Mu-Li-Tang) for post-stroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
- The impact of levodopa on post-stroke depression: the ESTREL-depression-study.European stroke journal · 2026Trial
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResults of small trials indicate that fluoxetine might improve functional outcomes after stroke. The FOCUS trial aimed to provide a precise estimate of these effects.
methodsFOCUS was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 103 hospitals in the UK. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, were enrolled and randomly assigned between 2 days and 15 days after onset, and had focal neurological deficits. Patients were randomly allocated fluoxetine 20 mg or matching placebo orally once daily for 6 months via a web-based system by use of a minimisation algorithm. The primary outcome was functional status, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff, and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Functional status was assessed at 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed according to their treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83290762.
findingsBetween Sept 10, 2012, and March 31, 2017, 3127 patients were recruited. 1564 patients were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 allocated placebo. mRS data at 6 months were available for 1553 (99·3%) patients in each treatment group. The distribution across mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0·951 [95% CI 0·839-1·079]; p=0·439). Patients allocated fluoxetine were less likely than those allocated placebo to develop new depression by 6 months (210 [13·43%] patients vs 269 [17·21%]; difference 3·78% [95% CI 1·26-6·30]; p=0·0033), but they had more bone fractures (45 [2·88%] vs 23 [1·47%]; difference 1·41% [95% CI 0·38-2·43]; p=0·0070). There were no significant differences in any other event at 6 or 12 months.
interpretationFluoxetine 20 mg given daily for 6 months after acute stroke does not seem to improve functional outcomes. Although the treatment reduced the occurrence of depression, it increased the frequency of bone fractures. These results do not support the routine use of fluoxetine either for the prevention of post-stroke depression or to promote recovery of function.
fundingUK Stroke Association and NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.