Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30528311›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2019

Emerging imaging technologies in dermatology: Part I: Basic principles.

Samantha L Schneider, Indermeet Kohli, Iltefat H Hamzavi, M Laurin Council, Anthony M Rossi, David M Ozog

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04679961 (Deep Learning on 3D Cellular-resolution Tomogram), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04679961 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Deep Learning on 3D Cellular-resolution Tomogram

TypeobservationalSponsorMackay Memorial HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled107ConditionsSkin DiseasesArmsApolloVue® S100 Image System (Apollo Medical Optics)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. S1 guideline for imaging diagnostics for skin diseases.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Noninvasive imaging exploration of phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica using high-frequency ultrasound and optical coherence tomography: Can biopsy of PPK patients be avoided?Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Utilizing deep learning for dermal matrix quality assessment on in vivo line-field confocal optical coherence tomography images.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha L SchneiderDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: sschnei3@hfhs.org.
Indermeet KohliDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Iltefat H HamzaviDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
M Laurin CouncilDivision of Dermatology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David M OzogDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: dozog1@hfhs.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermatologists rely primarily on clinical examination in combination with histopathology to diagnose conditions; however, clinical examination alone might not be sufficient for accurate diagnosis and skin biopsies have associated morbidity. With continued technological advancement, there are emerging ancillary imaging technologies available to dermatologists to aid in diagnosis and management. This 2-part review article will discuss these emerging technologies including: digital photographic imaging, confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and high-frequency ultrasound, as well as several additional modalities in development. In this first installment, the authors describe the breadth of technologies available and the science behind them. Then, in the second article, the authors discuss the applications and limitations of these technologies and future directions.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyDermatologyDermoscopyFluorescenceHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalOptical ImagingPhotoacoustic TechniquesPhotographySkin DiseasesSpectrum Analysis, RamanTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonographyconfocal microscopydermatologydermoscopydigital photographic imagingfluorescence imaginghigh-frequency ultrasoundmachine-based learningmultispectral optoacoustic tomographyoptical coherence tomographyRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID30528311
PMCPMC7469876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.