Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30527941›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019

Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

Melanie R Meister, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Chiara Ghetti, Christine M Chu, Theresa Spitznagle, David K Warren, Jerry L Lowder

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04658784 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Barbed Suture Versus Non-Barbed Suture for Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2020 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsRectoceleArms2-0 dioxanone, glycolide and trimethylene carbonate, 2-0 polydioxanone
NCT04853849 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Overactive Bladder With a Digital Conversational Agent: the MOTIVATION Study

TypeobservationalSponsorRenalisRan2021 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Urge Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Disorders
NCT05750212 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Musculoskeletal and Pelvic Floor Health in Female Chronic Overlapping Pelvic Pain Conditions (The MSK-PELVIC Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorLoyola UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled208ConditionsChronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeArmsTone, Tenderness, Contraction, Relaxation, Electromyography
NCT05968937 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Baclofen in Chronic Pelvic Pain, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LouisvilleRan2024 to 2026Enrolled39ConditionsChronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeArms20 mg baclofen vaginal suppository daily per vagina, Placebo
NCT07245537 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

EndoGym Progetto di Riabilitazione Del Pavimento Pelvico e Trattamento Del Dolore Miofasciale e Dispareunia Tramite la Pratica Dello Yoga in Pazienti Con Diagnosi di Endometriosi.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ModenaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled82ConditionsEndometriosisArmsYoga, Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy
NCT07605598 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Quantitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Muscle Fitness in Myofascial Pelvic Pain Before and After Myofascially-Directed Therapies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2026 to 2029Enrolled120ConditionsMyofacial Pain, Pelvic Pain, Myofascial Pelvic Pain, Chronic Pelvic PainArmsNear Infrared Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie R MeisterDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: meisterm@wustl.edu.
Siobhan SutcliffeDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Chiara GhettiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Christine M ChuDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Theresa SpitznagleDepartment of Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
David K WarrenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Jerry L LowderDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Reproductive Epidemiology Training Program at Washington University in St. LouisT32HD055172 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, TESSA · 2009 to 2018
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY

designA screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

resultsThe final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001).

conclusionOur newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsFemaleGynecological ExaminationHumansMiddle AgedMyofascial Pain SyndromesPain MeasurementPelvic Floor DisordersPelvic PainYoung Adultmyofascial painpelvic paintrigger point

Identifiers

PMID30527941
PMCPMC6401230
OpenAlexW2904771133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.