ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Thermodynamic Modeling of the Statistics of Cell Spreading on Ligand-Coated Elastic Substrates.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular matrix physical properties regulate cancer cell morphological transitions in 3D hydrogel microtissues.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Active viscoelastic models for cell and tissue mechanics.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Feedback between mechanosensitive signaling and active forces governs endothelial junction integrity.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneity.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Cell Shape and Durotaxis Explained from Cell-Extracellular Matrix Forces and Focal Adhesion Dynamics.iScience · 2020Article
- Cellular Contact Guidance Emerges from Gap Avoidance.Cell reports. Physical science · 2020Article
- Nuclear Mechanics within Intact Cells Is Regulated by Cytoskeletal Network and Internal Nanostructures.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Article
- Free-energy-based framework for early forecasting of stem cell differentiation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological spread cells exist in a perpetually fluctuating state and therefore cannot be described in terms of a unique deterministic system. For modeling approaches to provide novel insight and uncover new mechanisms that drive cell behavior, a framework is required that progresses from traditional deterministic methods (whereby simulation of an experiment predicts a single outcome). In this study, we implement a new, to our knowledge, modeling approach for the analysis of cell spreading on ligand-coated substrates, extending the framework for nonequilibrium thermodynamics of cells developed by Shishvan et al. to include active focal adhesion assembly. We demonstrate that the model correctly predicts the coupled influence of surface collagen density and substrate stiffness on cell spreading, as reported experimentally by Engler et al. Low surface collagen densities are shown to result in a high probability that cells will be restricted to low spread areas. Furthermore, elastic free energy induced by substrate deformation lowers the probability of observing a highly spread cell, and, consequentially, lower cell tractions affect the assembly of focal adhesions. Experimentally measurable observables such as cell spread area and aspect ratio can be directly postprocessed from the computed homeostatic ensemble of (several million) spread states. This allows for the prediction of mean and SDs of such experimental observables. This class of cell mechanics modeling presents a significant advance on conventional deterministic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.