ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Analyzing the Dynamics of Single TBP-DNA-NC2 Complexes Using Hidden Markov Models.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct observation of subunit rotation during DNA strand exchange by serine recombinases.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Reply to: On the statistical foundation of a recent single molecule FRET benchmark.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Deep-LASI: deep-learning assisted, single-molecule imaging analysis of multi-color DNA origami structures.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A blind benchmark of analysis tools to infer kinetic rate constants from single-molecule FRET trajectories.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Gold Ion Beam Milled Gold Zero-Mode Waveguides.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Regulatory factor identification forFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Curative Effect of Continuous Nursing Based on Data Mining on Patients with Liver Tumors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices.eLife · 2021Review
- DNA origami-based single-molecule force spectroscopy elucidates RNA Polymerase III pre-initiation complex stability.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Computational Structural Biology: Successes, Future Directions, and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer (spFRET) has become an important tool for investigating conformational dynamics in biological systems. To extract dynamic information from the spFRET traces measured with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we extended the hidden Markov model (HMM) approach. In our extended HMM analysis, we incorporated the photon-shot noise from camera-based systems into the HMM. Thus, the variance in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiency of the various states, which is typically a fitted parameter, is explicitly included in the analysis estimated from the number of detected photons. It is also possible to include an additional broadening of the FRET state, which would then only reflect the inherent flexibility of the dynamic biological systems. This approach is useful when comparing the dynamics of individual molecules for which the total intensities vary significantly. We used spFRET with the extended HMM analysis to investigate the dynamics of TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) on promoter DNA in the presence of negative cofactor 2 (NC2). We compared the dynamics of two promoters as well as DNAs of different length and labeling location. For the adenovirus major late promoter, four FRET states were observed; three states correspond to different conformations of the DNA in the TBP-DNA-NC2 complex and a four-state model in which the complex has shifted along the DNA. The HMM analysis revealed that the states are connected via a linear, four-well model. For the H2B promoter, more complex dynamics were observed. By clustering the FRET states detected with the HMM analysis, we could compare the general dynamics observed for the two promoter sequences. We observed that the dynamics from a stretched DNA conformation to a bent conformation for the two promoters were similar, whereas the bent conformation of the TBP-DNA-NC2 complex for the H2B promoter is approximately three times more stable than for the adenovirus major late promoter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.