Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30527204›Full record

Trial reportThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2018

Comparison of 4.8 Fr and 6 Fr ureteral stents on stent related symptoms following ureterorenoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Alkan Cubuk, Fatih Yanaral, Faruk Ozgor, Metin Savun, Harun Ozdemir, Akif Erbin, Bahar Yuksel, Omer Sarilar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05598710 (Ureteral Stent Related Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms- A Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05598710 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ureteral Stent Related Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms- A Comparative Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2021 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsUreteral Stent-Related SymptomArmsPigtail Insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alkan CubukDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: alkancubuk@hotmail.com.
Fatih YanaralDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faruk OzgorDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Metin SavunDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Harun OzdemirDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Akif ErbinDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar YukselDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Esenler Maternity and Children's Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Omer SarilarDepartment of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of ureteral stent diameters on ureteral stent-related symptoms were evaluated by using Turkish-validated Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ). Datas on 126 patients underwent uncomplicated flexible ureterorenoscopy and 62 patients underwent uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopy surgery without stent insertion (group 3) were collected. Patients were randomized preoperatively in a double-blind fashion to 4.8 French (group 1) and 6 French (group 2) ureteral JJ stents groups. The first follow-up visit was done at one week after surgery for all groups. Stents were removed on the third postoperative week for stented groups. The second follow-up visit was done at one week after stent removal for group 1 and group 2, and four week after surgery for group 3. Preoperative characteristics, operation time and hospitalization times were similar in both groups. Total USSQ scores were 91.9, 103.0, 44.2 at first visit and 54.3, 58.7, 28.5 at second visit in group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively. At both first and second visits, the group 2 had significantly higher USSQ scores than the group 1 (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Group 1 and 2 had higher scores than group 3 at both visits. Ureteral stents are associated with poor effects on patients' comfort and high USSQ scores. Using 4.8 Fr JJ stents improves stent-related symptoms and decreases the USSQ score more than 6 Fr JJ stents. Therefore, if ureteral stent is to be used after URS, we recommend using 4.8 Fr stent.

Indexed as

StentsUreteroscopyAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePostoperative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUreterQuestionnaireSymptom scoreUreteral stentUreteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID30527204
PMCPMC11915623
OpenAlexW2883316914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.