Trial reportThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2018
Comparison of 4.8 Fr and 6 Fr ureteral stents on stent related symptoms following ureterorenoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05598710 (Ureteral Stent Related Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms- A Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ureteral Stent Related Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms- A Comparative Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and procedural factors influencing ureteral stent dwell time and removal methods after endourological procedures: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Tolerability of 4.7Fr versus 6Fr ureteral stents following intracorporeal lithotripsy: a single center, patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Size does matter: ureteral stents with a smaller diameter show advantages regarding urinary symptoms, pain levels and general health.World journal of urology · 2020Trial
- Pre-Stenting: Is Smaller Better? A Multicentric Evaluation of 4.8 F and 6 F JJ Stents in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Impact of ureteric stent diameter on stent-related symptoms and early outcomes after kidney transplantation: A randomised controlled trial.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Comparison of ureteral stent diameters on ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
- Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents.Research and reports in urology · 2020Review
- Review
- Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Urology annalsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of ureteral stent diameters on ureteral stent-related symptoms were evaluated by using Turkish-validated Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ). Datas on 126 patients underwent uncomplicated flexible ureterorenoscopy and 62 patients underwent uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopy surgery without stent insertion (group 3) were collected. Patients were randomized preoperatively in a double-blind fashion to 4.8 French (group 1) and 6 French (group 2) ureteral JJ stents groups. The first follow-up visit was done at one week after surgery for all groups. Stents were removed on the third postoperative week for stented groups. The second follow-up visit was done at one week after stent removal for group 1 and group 2, and four week after surgery for group 3. Preoperative characteristics, operation time and hospitalization times were similar in both groups. Total USSQ scores were 91.9, 103.0, 44.2 at first visit and 54.3, 58.7, 28.5 at second visit in group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively. At both first and second visits, the group 2 had significantly higher USSQ scores than the group 1 (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Group 1 and 2 had higher scores than group 3 at both visits. Ureteral stents are associated with poor effects on patients' comfort and high USSQ scores. Using 4.8 Fr JJ stents improves stent-related symptoms and decreases the USSQ score more than 6 Fr JJ stents. Therefore, if ureteral stent is to be used after URS, we recommend using 4.8 Fr stent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.