Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30526729›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Evaluating Response Time in Zanzibar's Malaria Elimination Case-Based Surveillance-Response System.

Eeshan Khandekar, Randall Kramer, Abdullah S Ali, Abdul-Wahid Al-Mafazy, Joseph R Egger, Sara LeGrand, Humphrey R Mkali, Michael McKay, Jeremiah M Ngondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eeshan KhandekarDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Randall KramerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abdullah S AliZanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Abdul-Wahid Al-MafazyZanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Joseph R EggerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sara LeGrandDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Humphrey R MkaliThe Palladium Group, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Michael McKayRTI International, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeremiah M NgondiRTI International, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As countries transition toward malaria elimination, malaria programs rely on surveillance-response systems, which are often supported by web- and mobile phone-based reporting tools. Such surveillance-response systems are interventions for elimination, making it important to determine if they are operating optimally. A metric to measure this by is timeliness. This study used a mixed-methods approach to investigate the response time of Zanzibar's malaria elimination surveillance-response system, Malaria Case Notification (MCN). MCN conducts both passive and reactive case detection, supported by a mobile phone-based reporting tool called Coconut Surveillance. Using data obtained from RTI International and the Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Program (ZAMEP), analysis of summary statistics was conducted to investigate the association of response time with geography, and time series techniques were used to investigate trends in response time and its association with the number of reported cases. Results indicated that response time varied by the district in Zanzibar (0.6-6.05 days) and that it was not associated with calendar time or the number of reported cases. Survey responses and focus groups with a cadre of health workers, district malaria surveillance officers, shed light on operational challenges faced during case investigation, such as incomplete health records and transportation issues, which stem from deficiencies in aspects of ZAMEP's program management. These findings illustrate that timely response for malaria elimination depends on effective program management, despite the automation of web-based or mobile phone-based tools. For surveillance-response systems to work optimally, malaria programs should ensure that optimal management practices are in place.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsCell PhoneCommunicable Disease ControlDisease EradicationDisease NotificationEpidemiological MonitoringHealth PersonnelHumansMalariaMosquito NetsTanzaniaTelemedicineTime FactorsAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID30526729
PMCPMC6367619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.