ArticleBMC genomics2018
Microsatellite development from genome skimming and transcriptome sequencing: comparison of strategies and lessons from frog species.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic diversity and population structure of the Dermacentor nuttalli in Northern China inferred from microsatellite markers.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Development and validation of whole-genome SSR markers in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic microsatellite characterization and development of polymorphic microsatellites in Eospalax baileyi.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers in the Great Web-Spinning SawflyEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Mining expressed sequence tag (EST) microsatellite markers to assess the genetic differentiation of five Hynobius species endemic to Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Low-coverage whole genome sequencing of eleven species/subspecies inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Mining Amphibian and Insect Transcriptomes for Antimicrobial Peptide Sequences with rAMPage.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Genome skimming-based simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker discovery and characterization inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Article
- Genome skimming-based STMS marker discovery and its validation in temperate hill bambooJournal of genetics · 2021Article
- Assigning the Sex-Specific Markers via Genotyping-by-Sequencing onto the Y Chromosome for a Torrent FrogGenes · 2020Article
- The mitochondrial genome of broad-folded frog (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019Article
- Virtual screening of a MDR-TB WhiB6 target identified by gene expression profiling.Bioinformation · 2019Article
- The Origin and Evolution of Chromosomal Reciprocal Translocation inFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEven though microsatellite loci frequently have been isolated using recently developed next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, this task is still difficult because of the subsequent polymorphism screening requires a substantial amount of time. Selecting appropriate polymorphic microsatellites is a critical issue for ecological and evolutionary studies. However, the extent to which assembly strategy, read length, sequencing depth, and library layout produce a measurable effect on microsatellite marker development remains unclear. Here, we use six frog species for genome skimming and two frog species for transcriptome sequencing to develop microsatellite markers, and investigate the effect of different isolation strategies on the yield of microsatellites.
resultsThe results revealed that the number of isolated microsatellites increases with increased data quantity and read length. Assembly strategy could influence the yield and the polymorphism of microsatellite development. Larger k-mer sizes produced fewer total number of microsatellite loci, but these loci had a longer repeat length, suggesting greater polymorphism. However, the proportion of each type of nucleotide repeats was not affected; dinucleotide repeats were always the dominant type. Finally, the transcriptomic microsatellites displayed lower levels of polymorphisms and were less abundant than genomic microsatellites, but more likely to be functionally linked loci.
conclusionsThese observations provide deep insight into the evolution and distribution of microsatellites and how different isolation strategies affect microsatellite development using NGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.