Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30526383›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research2019

Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS): Development and validation.

Catherine F Eubanks, Jessica Lubitz, J Christopher Muran, Jeremy D Safran

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Renegotiating tasks or goals as rupture repair: A task analysis in a cognitive-behavioral therapy for personality disorder.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine F Eubanksa Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology , Yeshiva University , Bronx , NY , USA.
Jessica Lubitza Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology , Yeshiva University , Bronx , NY , USA.
J Christopher Muranb Brief Psychotherapy Research Program , Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
Jeremy D Safranb Brief Psychotherapy Research Program , Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.

Funding

Resolving Ruptures in Therapeutic AllianceR34MH071768 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CTR (NEW YORK) · PI MURAN, JOHN CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2008
$681k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH071768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to examine the reliability and validity of the Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS), an observer-based measure of alliance ruptures and resolution processes.

methodWe used the 3RS to rate early sessions from 42 cases of cognitive behavior therapy. We compared the 3RS to a simplified version of the Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB), as well as patient and therapist self-reports of ruptures and the alliance.

resultsCoders achieved high rates of interrater reliability on the frequency of confrontation and withdrawal ruptures and resolution strategies (ICCs = .85 to .98), as well as ratings of the therapist's contribution to ruptures and the extent to which ruptures were resolved (ICC = .92). Predictive validity analyses found that confrontation markers (d = .74), successful resolution (d = .67), and ratings of the therapist's contribution to ruptures (d = .61) predicted dropout from therapy. Analyses of convergent validity with the SASB failed to meet predictions; however, we observed theoretically coherent relations between 3RS and SASB variables. Confrontation rupture markers were significantly associated with patient self-report of rupture (d = 1.54) and therapist self-reported alliance (r = -.50, p = .002).

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that the 3RS is a reliable and useful tool for examining psychotherapy process and predicting dropout. Clinical or methodological significance of this article: This study provides evidence of the reliability and validity of the 3RS, an observer-based measure of alliance ruptures and resolution processes. The 3RS can be used to identify problems in the therapeutic relationship that are associated with premature dropout from therapy.

Indexed as

Therapeutic AllianceAdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProcess Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultprocess researchpsychotherapy outcomerupturestherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID30526383
PMCPMC6408286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.