Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30525517›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2019

Emissions of Free Radicals, Carbonyls, and Nicotine from the NIDA Standardized Research Electronic Cigarette and Comparison to Similar Commercial Devices.

Zachary T Bitzer, Reema Goel, Samantha M Reilly, Gurkirat Bhangu, Neil Trushin, Jonathan Foulds, Joshua Muscat, John P Richie

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Standardized research electronic cigarette acceptability among adult men and women who smoke combustible cigarettes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. E‑Cigarettes Generate Gas Phase Ions.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cannabis concentrate vaping chemistry.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary T BitzerDepartment of Food Science , Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8026-860X
Reema GoelDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science (TCORS) , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-4315
Samantha M ReillyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science (TCORS) , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-5748
Gurkirat BhanguDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science (TCORS) , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States.
Neil TrushinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science (TCORS) , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States.
Jonathan FouldsDepartment of Food Science , Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States.
Joshua MuscatDepartment of Food Science , Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States.
John P RichieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science (TCORS) , Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania 17033 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8239-2850
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Research Training and Educational Component (Component I) p370-385P50DA036107 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FOULDS, JONATHAN, MUSCAT, JOSHUA E · 2013 to 2018
$19.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarettes (e-cigs) are a diverse and continuously evolving group of products with four generations currently in the market. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) standardized research e-cigarette (SREC) is intended to provide researchers with a consistent e-cig device with known characteristics. Thus, we conducted laboratory-based characterizations of oxidants and nicotine in aerosols produced from SREC and other closed-system, breath-activated, commercially available e-cigs (Blu and Vuse). We hypothesized that oxidant and nicotine production will be significantly affected in all devices by changes in puffing parameters. All e-cigs were machine vaped and the aerosols generated were examined for nicotine, carbonyls, and free-radicals while varying the puff-volumes and puff-durations to reflect typical human usage. The data were normalized on a per puff, per gram aerosol, and per milligram nicotine basis. We found that aerosol production generally increased with increasing puff-duration and puff-volume in all e-cigs tested. Increased puff-duration and puff-volume increased nicotine delivery for Blu and Vuse but not the SREC. We report, for the first time, reactive free-radicals in aerosols from all closed-system e-cigs tested, albeit at levels lower than cigarette smoke. Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, and propionaldehyde were detected in the aerosols of all tested e-cigs. Carbonyl and free radical production is affected by puff-duration and puff volume. Overall, SREC was more efficient at aerosol and nicotine production than both Blu and Vuse. In terms of carbonyl and free radical levels, SREC delivered lower or similar levels to both other devices.

Indexed as

AcetaldehydeAcetoneAcroleinAerosolsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFormaldehydeFree RadicalsHumansNational Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.)NicotineTobacco ProductsUnited StatesAcetaldehydeAcetoneAcroleinAerosolsFormaldehydeFree RadicalsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID30525517
PMCPMC8323638
OpenAlexW2904568902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.