Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30525115›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2018

How do we use in vitro models to understand epileptiform and ictal activity? A report of the TASK1-WG4 group of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force.

Chris G Dulla, Damir Janigro, Premysl Jiruska, Joseph V Raimondo, Akio Ikeda, Chou-Ching K Lin, Howard P Goodkin, Aristea S Galanopoulou, Christophe Bernard, Marco de Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial Glutamine Metabolism Drives Epileptogenesis in Primary Hippocampal Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chris G DullaDepartment of Neuroscience Tufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
Damir JanigroFlocel Inc. and Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio U.S.A.
Premysl JiruskaDepartment of Developmental Epileptology Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czechia.
Joseph V RaimondoDivision of Cell Biology and Neuroscience Institute Department of Human Biology Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8266-3128
Akio IkedaDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Chou-Ching K LinDepartment of Neurology National Cheng Kung University Hospital College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan.
Howard P GoodkinThe Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A.
Aristea S GalanopoulouLaboratory of Developmental Epilepsy Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology Isabelle Rapin Division of Child Neurology Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Einstein/Montefiore Epilepsy Center Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York U.S.A.
Christophe BernardAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst Marseille France.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-1966
Marco de CurtisEpilepsy Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano Italy.

Funding

The Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Antiepileptogenic Therapy (EpiBioS4Rx) Public Engagement CoreU54NS100064 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2017 to 2021
$21.7M
GABA-inflammation interplay in infantile spasmsR01NS091170 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GALANOPOULOU, ARISTEA S · 2015 to 2020
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091170NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro brain tissue preparations allow the convenient and affordable study of brain networks and have allowed us to garner molecular, cellular, and electrophysiologic insights into brain function with a detail not achievable in vivo. Preparations from both rodent and human postsurgical tissue have been utilized to generate in vitro electrical activity similar to electrographic activity seen in patients with epilepsy. A great deal of knowledge about how brain networks generate various forms of epileptiform activity has been gained, but due to the multiple in vitro models and manipulations used, there is a need for a standardization across studies. Here, we describe epileptiform patterns generated using in vitro brain preparations, focusing on issues and best practices pertaining to recording, reporting, and interpretation of the electrophysiologic patterns observed. We also discuss criteria for defining in vitro seizure-like patterns (i.e., ictal) and interictal discharges. Unifying terminologies and definitions are proposed. We suggest a set of best practices for reporting in vitro studies to favor both efficient across-lab comparisons and translation to in vivo models and human studies.

Indexed as

Ictal activityIn vitro modelsReview

Identifiers

PMID30525115
PMCPMC6276782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.