Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524886›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology

An observational study of concomitant immunotherapies and denosumab in patients with advanced melanoma or lung cancer.

Alexander Liede, Rohini K Hernandez, Sally W Wade, Ronghai Bo, Nathan C Nussbaum, Elizabeth Ahern, William C Dougall, Mark J Smyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Bone mineral density changes following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: insights from a case series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander LiedeCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, California, USA.
Rohini K HernandezCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, California, USA.
Sally W WadeCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, California, USA.
Ronghai BoCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, California, USA.
Nathan C NussbaumFlatiron Health, New York, USA.
Elizabeth AhernImmunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia.
William C DougallImmuno-oncology Discovery Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia.
Mark J SmythImmunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a case report of profound clinical response in a melanoma patient following treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and RANK-ligand inhibitor denosumab, we identified similar patients from electronic health records (EHR) and described patient characteristics and outcomes. This 2017 observational study used Flatiron Health's EHR database from ~255 US cancer clinics. Included were advanced melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received denosumab within 30 days of CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) or PD1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) inhibitors start with a minimum of 6 months of follow up. Real-world tumor response (rwTR) was analyzed for scans available up to 30 days after concomitant therapy. Preclinical experiments evaluated sequencing of ICI, denosumab vs monotherapy or control. Melanoma (n = 66) patients received concomitant denosumab/ICI for a mean 4.0 months, 3.1 months for NSCLC (n = 241). Two-thirds of patients had best rwTR evaluable (complete [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], or disease progression [PD]). Longer mean duration of concomitant exposure was associated with overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) in melanoma (p = 0.0172), NSCLC (p < .0001), and combined cohorts (p < .0001). The disease control rate (ORR plus SD) was 56% amongst melanoma patients and 58% amongst NSCLC patients. Longer concomitant therapy was associated with increased overall survival, primarily in NSCLC (p < .0001). Preclinical data suggest that ICI initiated before or at same time as denosumab was optimal. Results provide proof-of-concept that rwTR is associated with concomitant denosumab/ICI. Crude survival analyses supported the association of concomitant therapy and improved outcomes outside of clinical trials and warrant comparative study.

Indexed as

denosumabImmune checkpoint inhibitormelanomanon-small cell lung cancerRANK-ligand inhibitorreal-worldresponsesurvival

Identifiers

PMID30524886
PMCPMC6279336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.