ArticleClinical kidney journal2018
Nephrology in Bosnia and Herzegovina: impact of the 1992-95 war.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disasters and kidney care: pitfalls and solutions.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- War in Ukraine and dialysis treatment: human suffering and organizational challenges.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Review
- Sustainable Development Goals relevant to kidney health: an update on progress.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Review
- Recent Pattern of Acute Kidney Injury in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has now been more than two decades since the end of the 1992-95 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This may well be the proper time to provide the nephrology community with an appraisal of the care of patients with chronic kidney disease in the pre-war, war and post-war periods in the European transitional country. This report on nephrology in Bosnia and Herzegovina draws attention to the hurdles faced for three turbulent years on that burdensome path of providing quality care, and the chance it offered in developing a successful transplant programme while facing the dreadful chaos of war and a migrant crisis. The perception of war and natural disasters is quite different, from the victim's point of view, from the standardized and well-arranged healthcare systems in the developed world. The guidelines, written in peace, are extremely useful, but are often hard to follow during natural disasters or barbarous wars. Each of the periods described had its specificities as well as its good and bad sides. Despite the unquestionable destructive nature of the war, it was a catalyst for nephrology in Bosnia and Herzegovina to move forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.