Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524701›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2018

First-generation

James M Stone, Simon Roux, David Taylor, Paul D Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical correlates of early onset antipsychotic treatment resistance.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James M StoneCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-0135
Simon RouxInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David TaylorInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Paul D MorrisonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of long-acting injectable formulations (LAIs) of second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs) has been suggested as having advantage over first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) LAIs. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that there was a longer time to relapse in patients with schizophrenia started on SGA LAI

methodsPatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were started on an SGA LAI while on an inpatient ward were identified through searching of the anonymised historical medical records at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Patients starting FGA LAIs matched for diagnosis, age and date of hospital admission were identified. Time to readmission, discontinuation of LAI or death were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots were generated for each group, and the difference between groups analysed using log-rank methods.

resultsThere were 157 patients identified in each group. There was no difference in time to readmission, medication discontinuation or death in patients on SGA LAI

conclusionsWe found no evidence of advantage in terms of maintaining response in SGA LAI

Indexed as

antipsychoticDepotefficacyschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30524701
PMCPMC6278743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.