Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524648›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2018

Simultaneous Assessment of Cardiac Inflammation and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction.

Isabel T Ramos, Markus Henningsson, Maryam Nezafat, Begoña Lavin, Silvia Lorrio, Pierre Gebhardt, Andrea Protti, Thomas R Eykyn, Marcelo E Andia, Ulrich Flögel and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular contrast agents for post-infarct cardiac remodelling: a contemporary review.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of PDGF-A/B Ligands in Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Perfluorocarbons-BasedInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2019
    Review
  17. Dual-ContrastCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel T RamosSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Markus HenningssonSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maryam NezafatSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Begoña LavinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia LorrioSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pierre GebhardtSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea ProttiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas R EykynSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marcelo E AndiaRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ulrich FlögelDepartment of Molecular Cardiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alkystis PhinikaridouSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ajay M ShahSchool of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
René M BotnarSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/12/1/29262Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal healing of the myocardium following myocardial infarction (MI) requires a suitable degree of inflammation and its timely resolution, together with a well-orchestrated deposition and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Methods and Results: MI and SHAM-operated animals were imaged at 3,7,14 and 21 days with 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a Conclusions: Multinuclear

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyocardial InfarctionMyocarditisMyocardiumBiomarkersExtracellular Matrix Proteinscardiac biomarkersextracellular matrixFibrosisimagingInflammationIschemiamacrophagemagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)molecular imagingmyocardial remodelingTranslational Studies

Identifiers

PMID30524648
PMCPMC6277008
OpenAlexW2901191265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.