Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524511›Full record

ArticleCancer nanotechnology2018

Towards photon radiotherapy treatment planning with high Z nanoparticle radiosensitisation agents: the Relative Biological Effective Dose (RBED) framework.

Jeremy M C Brown, Gerard G Hanna, Nathanael Lampe, Balder Villagomez-Bernabe, James R Nicol, Jonathan A Coulter, Fred J Currell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nanotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremy M C Brown1School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.
Gerard G Hanna4School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.
Nathanael Lampe5Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Balder Villagomez-Bernabe1School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.
James R Nicol6School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.
Jonathan A Coulter6School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.
Fred J Currell1School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel treatment planning framework, the Relative Biological Effective Dose (RBED), for high Z nanoparticle (NP)-enhanced photon radiotherapy is developed and tested in silico for the medical exemplar of neoadjuvant (preoperative) breast cancer MV photon radiotherapy. Two different treatment scenarios, conventional and high Z NP enhanced, were explored with a custom Geant4 application that was developed to emulate the administration of a single 2 Gy fraction as part of a 50 Gy radiotherapy treatment plan. It was illustrated that there was less than a 1% difference in the dose deposition throughout the standard and high Z NP-doped adult female phantom. Application of the RBED framework found that the extent of possible biological response with high Z NP doping was great than expected via the dose deposition alone. It is anticipated that this framework will assist the scientific community in future high Z NP-enhanced in-silico, pre-clinical and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Biological effect modellingNanoparticlesRadiosensitisersRadiotherapyTheranostic nanoparticlesTreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID30524511
PMCPMC6244633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.