ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018
Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Converge to Accelerate Forest Tree Breeding.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic early growth mechanisms of two endangered Mexican spruces.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-model GWAS prior information enhances genomic prediction of cold tolerance traits in Populus simonii.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Breeding for climate adaptation: genetic variation and genomic selection for drought response in Scots pine.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Strategic global data integration to improve genomic prediction accuracy in tree breeding programs facing resource limitations, a case study in mango.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Genetic Variation in Pulpwood Properties of Hybrid Larch Families and Their Progenies.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From wild shrub to cultivated host: a genetic roadmap for enhancing lac production inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Needle- and Canopy-Level Genetic Variation in Scots Pine (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Application and development prospect of genomic selection breeding in coniferous trees.Planta · 2025Review
- Whole Genome Resequencing of 205 Avocado Trees Unveils the Genomic Patterns of Racial Divergence in the Americas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in Genetic Engineering Techniques for Improved Forest Trees: Applications in Biomass, Stress Resilience and Carbon Sequestration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Exploring the genetic basis of heterosis in eucalypt growth based on transcriptome analysis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Climate adaptation in Populus trichocarpa: key adaptive loci identified for stomata and leaf traits.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction of Adaptation in Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cross-generational genomic prediction of Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood properties: an evaluation using independent validation.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Population structure limits the use of genomic data for predicting phenotypes and managing genetic resources in forest trees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic Prediction in a Self-Fertilized Progenies ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Directed mutagenesis in fruit crops.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest tree breeding has been successful at delivering genetically improved material for multiple traits based on recurrent cycles of selection, mating, and testing. However, long breeding cycles, late flowering, variable juvenile-mature correlations, emerging pests and diseases, climate, and market changes, all pose formidable challenges. Genetic dissection approaches such as quantitative trait mapping and association genetics have been fruitless to effectively drive operational marker-assisted selection (MAS) in forest trees, largely because of the complex multifactorial inheritance of most, if not all traits of interest. The convergence of high-throughput genomics and quantitative genetics has established two new paradigms that are changing contemporary tree breeding dogmas. Genomic selection (GS) uses large number of genome-wide markers to predict complex phenotypes. It has the potential to accelerate breeding cycles, increase selection intensity and improve the accuracy of breeding values. Realized genomic relationships matrices, on the other hand, provide innovations in genetic parameters' estimation and breeding approaches by tracking the variation arising from random Mendelian segregation in pedigrees. In light of a recent flow of promising experimental results, here we briefly review the main concepts, analytical tools and remaining challenges that currently underlie the application of genomics data to tree breeding. With easy and cost-effective genotyping, we are now at the brink of extensive adoption of GS in tree breeding. Areas for future GS research include optimizing strategies for updating prediction models, adding validated functional genomics data to improve prediction accuracy, and integrating genomic and multi-environment data for forecasting the performance of genetic material in untested sites or under changing climate scenarios. The buildup of phenotypic and genome-wide data across large-scale breeding populations and advances in computational prediction of discrete genomic features should also provide opportunities to enhance the application of genomics to tree breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.