Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524463›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Converge to Accelerate Forest Tree Breeding.

Dario Grattapaglia, Orzenil B Silva-Junior, Rafael T Resende, Eduardo P Cappa, Bárbara S F Müller, Biyue Tan, Fikret Isik, Blaise Ratcliffe, Yousry A El-Kassaby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Prediction of Adaptation in Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Population structure limits the use of genomic data for predicting phenotypes and managing genetic resources in forest trees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Prediction in a Self-Fertilized Progenies ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dario GrattapagliaEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia Brasília, Brazil.
Orzenil B Silva-JuniorEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia Brasília, Brazil.
Rafael T ResendeEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia Brasília, Brazil.
Eduardo P CappaCentro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bárbara S F MüllerEMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia Brasília, Brazil.
Biyue TanBiomaterials Division Stora Enso AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fikret IsikDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, United States.
Blaise RatcliffeDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yousry A El-KassabyDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest tree breeding has been successful at delivering genetically improved material for multiple traits based on recurrent cycles of selection, mating, and testing. However, long breeding cycles, late flowering, variable juvenile-mature correlations, emerging pests and diseases, climate, and market changes, all pose formidable challenges. Genetic dissection approaches such as quantitative trait mapping and association genetics have been fruitless to effectively drive operational marker-assisted selection (MAS) in forest trees, largely because of the complex multifactorial inheritance of most, if not all traits of interest. The convergence of high-throughput genomics and quantitative genetics has established two new paradigms that are changing contemporary tree breeding dogmas. Genomic selection (GS) uses large number of genome-wide markers to predict complex phenotypes. It has the potential to accelerate breeding cycles, increase selection intensity and improve the accuracy of breeding values. Realized genomic relationships matrices, on the other hand, provide innovations in genetic parameters' estimation and breeding approaches by tracking the variation arising from random Mendelian segregation in pedigrees. In light of a recent flow of promising experimental results, here we briefly review the main concepts, analytical tools and remaining challenges that currently underlie the application of genomics data to tree breeding. With easy and cost-effective genotyping, we are now at the brink of extensive adoption of GS in tree breeding. Areas for future GS research include optimizing strategies for updating prediction models, adding validated functional genomics data to improve prediction accuracy, and integrating genomic and multi-environment data for forecasting the performance of genetic material in untested sites or under changing climate scenarios. The buildup of phenotypic and genome-wide data across large-scale breeding populations and advances in computational prediction of discrete genomic features should also provide opportunities to enhance the application of genomics to tree breeding.

Indexed as

genomic selection (GS)marker assisted selection (MAS)quantitative geneticsrealized genomic relationshipsingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)tree breedingwhole-genome regression

Identifiers

PMID30524463
PMCPMC6262028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.