Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018

Real World Lab Data: Patterns of Lymphocyte Counts in Fingolimod Treated Patients.

Maxi Kaufmann, Rocco Haase, Undine Proschmann, Tjalf Ziemssen, Katja Akgün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Fingolimod Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis Leads to the Enrichment of a Subpopulation of Aged NK Cells.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxi KaufmannMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Rocco HaaseMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Undine ProschmannMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Tjalf ZiemssenMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katja AkgünMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Fingolimod is approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and acts by its unique mechanism of action via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-modulation. Although fingolimod-associated lymphopenia is a well-known phenomenon, the exact cause for the intra- and inter-individual differences of the fluctuation of lymphocyte count and its subtypes is still subject of debate. In this analysis, we aim to estimate the significance of the individual variation of distinct lymphocyte subsets for differences in absolute lymphocyte decrease in fingolimod treated patients and discuss how different lymphocyte subset patterns are related to clinical presentation in a long-term real life setting. Methods/Design: One hundred and thirteen patients with MS were characterized by complete blood cell count and immune cell phentopying of peripheral lymphocyte subsets before, at month 1 and every 3 months up to 36 months of fingolimod treatment. In addition, patients were monitored regarding clinical parameters (relapses, disability, MRI). Results: There was no significant association of baseline lymphocyte count and lymphocyte subtypes with lymphocyte decrease after fingolimod start. The initial drop of the absolute lymphocyte count could not predict the level of lymphocyte count during steady state on fingolimod. Variable CD8+ T cell and NK cell counts account for the remarkable intra- and inter-individual differences regarding initial drop and steady state level of lymphocyte count during fingolimod treatment, whereas CD4+ T cells and B cells mostly present a quite uniform decrease in all treated patients. Selected patients with lymphocyte count >1.0 GPT/l differed by higher CD8+ T cells and NK cell counts compared to lymphopenic patients but presented comparable clinical effectiveness during treatment. Conclusion: Monitoring of the absolute lymphocyte count at steady state seems to be a rough estimate of fingolimod induced lymphocyte redistribution. Our results suggest, that evaluation of distinct lymphocyte subsets as CD4+ T cells allow a more detailed evaluation to weigh and interpret degree of lymphopenia and treatment response in fingolimod treated patients.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAdultB-LymphocytesCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMiddle AgedFingolimod Hydrochloridefingolimodlymphocyte subsetslymphopeniamonitoringreal world lab data

Identifiers

PMID30524432
PMCPMC6256977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.