Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524407›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018

Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?

Christopher Vinnard, Alyssa Mezochow, Hannah Oakland, Ross Klingsberg, John Hansen-Flaschen, Keith Hamilton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward better cures forClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Serum Cell-Free DNA-based Detection ofAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Liposomal drug delivery to manage nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and other chronic lung infections.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher VinnardPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States.
Alyssa MezochowPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Hannah OaklandDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Ross KlingsbergDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
John Hansen-FlaschenPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Keith HamiltonPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing progression of disease or response to treatment remains a major challenge in the clinical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections of the lungs. Serial assessments of validated measures of treatment response address whether the current therapeutic approach is on track toward clinical cure, which remains a fundamental question for clinicians and patients during the course of NTM disease treatment. The 2015 NTM Research Consortium Workshop, which included a patient advisory panel, identified treatment response biomarkers as a priority area for investigation. Limited progress in addressing this challenge also hampers drug development efforts. The Biomarker Qualification Program at the FDA supports the use of a validated treatment response biomarker across multiple drug development programs. Current approaches in clinical practice include microbiologic and radiographic monitoring, along with symptomatic and quality-of-life assessments. Blood-based monitoring, including assessments of humoral and cell-mediated NTM-driven immune responses, remain under investigation. Alignment of data collection schemes in prospective multicenter studies, including the support of biosample repositories, will support identification of treatment response biomarkers under standard-of-care and investigational therapeutic strategies. In this review, we outline the role of treatment monitoring biomarkers in both clinical practice and drug development frameworks.

Indexed as

biomarker (development)clinical trialnontuberculous mycobactenaquantitative cultureradiographyresponsetherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID30524407
PMCPMC6256187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.