Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524388›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Comparison of Serological and Molecular Methods With High-Throughput Sequencing for the Detection and Quantification of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus in Vineyard Samples.

Emmanuelle Vigne, Shahinez Garcia, Véronique Komar, Olivier Lemaire, Jean-Michel Hily

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmanuelle VigneL'UMR Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, INRA-Université de Strasbourg, Colmar, France.
Shahinez GarciaL'UMR Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, INRA-Université de Strasbourg, Colmar, France.
Véronique KomarL'UMR Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, INRA-Université de Strasbourg, Colmar, France.
Olivier LemaireL'UMR Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, INRA-Université de Strasbourg, Colmar, France.
Jean-Michel HilyL'UMR Santé de la Vigne et Qualité du Vin, INRA-Université de Strasbourg, Colmar, France.
Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is the main causal agent of fanleaf degeneration, the most damaging viral disease of grapevine. GFLV is included in most grapevine certification programs that rely on robust diagnostic tools such as biological indexing, serological methods, and molecular techniques, for the identification of clean stocks. The emergence of high throughput sequencing (HTS) offers new opportunities for detecting GFLV and other viruses in grapevine accessions of interest. Here, two HTS-based methods,

Indexed as

contamination evaluation protocoldetectionGFLVgrapevinehigh-throughput sequencingserological and molecular methods

Identifiers

PMID30524388
PMCPMC6262039
OpenAlexW2901088692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.