ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Interactions of
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Primary Dysmenorrhea and Mental Health Traits: A Study Based on Multi-Phenotype Correlation Network and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Female College Students.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Variations in TrkB.T1 Isoform and Their Association With Somatic and Psychological Symptoms in Individuals With IBS.The journal of pain · 2024Article
- Scientific Knowledge Graph of Dysmenorrhea: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2021.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism engages memory-associated systems to augment olfaction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Brain Dynamics Altered by Photic Stimulation in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The thermodynamic brain and the evolution of intellect: the role of mental energy.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The irregularity and uncertainty of neurophysiologic signals across different time scales can be regarded as neural complexity, which is related to the adaptability of the nervous system and the information processing between neurons. We recently reported general loss of brain complexity, as measured by multiscale sample entropy (MSE), at pain-related regions in females with primary dysmenorrhea (PDM). However, it is unclear whether this loss of brain complexity is associated with inter-subject genetic variations. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a widely expressed neurotrophin in the brain and is crucial to neural plasticity. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.