Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524209›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in infectious diseases2018

Building a Hepatitis C Clinical Program: Strategies to Optimize Outcomes.

Autumn Zuckerman, Alicia Carver, Cody A Chastain

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Commentary on Whitten et al.Canadian liver journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes of Low Barrier Hepatitis C Treatment in High Risk Populations From Primary Care.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024
    Article
  5. Aspects that facilitate access to care for viral hepatitis: An evaluative research.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. HCV reflex testing: A single-sample, low-contamination method that improves the diagnostic efficiency of HCV testing among patients in Alberta, Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Autumn Zuckerman1Specialty Pharmacy Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
Alicia Carver1Specialty Pharmacy Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
Cody A Chastain2Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A2200 MCN, 1161 21st Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-2605 USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAn increasing number of specialists and non-specialists are developing clinical programs to treat and cure hepatitis C virus (HCV). The goal of this paper is to evaluate and describe optimal strategies to improve outcomes related to HCV care delivery. RECENT

findingsScreening and diagnosis of HCV should be guided by established recommendations. Given the recognized disparity in HCV diagnosis and linkage to care, a multi-modal approach involving care coordination and technology resources should be used to improve patient engagement. Access to HCV treatment may be optimized through systematic documentation, prior authorization, and appeal processes. Treatment monitoring should emphasize medication adherence, side effect and drug interaction management, as well as elimination of practical barriers. Finally, post-treatment engagement to promote liver health and reduce the risk of complications or reinfection maximizes the benefit of HCV treatment. SUMMARY: The landscape of HCV treatment has evolved from a specialist-driven model with few patients qualifying for treatment to an opportunity for non-specialists and other providers to provide curative therapies in most patients. Innovative practice models that employ a multidisciplinary approach will likely improve screening, diagnosis, engagement, and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Care deliveryCascade of careHCVHepatitis C virusMultidisciplinary care

Identifiers

PMID30524209
PMCPMC6244618
OpenAlexW2897407028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.