Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30524177›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of plastic surgery2018

Discussing sexuality in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a national survey of current practice in the Netherlands.

Rieky E Dikmans, Esmée M Krouwel, Mahsa Ghasemi, Tim C van de Grift, Mark-Bram Bouman, Marco J P F Ritt, Henk W Elzevier, Margriet G Mullender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of plastic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sexual Dissatisfaction after Hand Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rieky E Dikmans1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Esmée M Krouwel2Department of Urology and Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mahsa Ghasemi1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tim C van de Grift1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark-Bram Bouman1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marco J P F Ritt1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk W Elzevier2Department of Urology and Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Margriet G Mullender1Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcomes have become increasingly important to assess the value of surgical procedures. Sexual function is a proven important constituent of quality of life, but is often overlooked by health care professionals. We aim to investigate to what extent plastic surgeons address or discuss issues concerning sexuality with their patients, and if there is a need for improvement.

methodsWe developed a survey to assess whether topics pertaining to sexual function were discussed during plastic surgical consultations. In 2016, all 385 members of the Dutch Association for Plastic Surgery were invited via post mail to participate.

resultsWe received 106 completed surveys (27.5%). The median age of the respondents was 45 (29-66) years. Most participants (78.3%) indicated that they rarely to never discuss sexuality with their patients. Surgeons in the subspecialization gender and genital surgery discussed sexual function most frequently. Two thirds of all respondents indicated that their current knowledge on this topic was insufficient, yet there was generally no interest expressed in receiving additional training (78.6%). However, there was a need for proper patient brochures (43.4%) and an organized referral network (36.5%) regarding sexuality.

conclusionsIn plastic surgery practice, sexuality appears to be a rarely discussed subject, with the gender and genital surgery subspecialties as the exception. Although professionals and patients emphasize the importance of sexuality, plastic surgeons express limited urge to be trained and prefer written patient information and referring patients to other healthcare professionals. The authors stimulate more education on sexuality during (continued) plastic surgery training.Level of Evidence: Not ratable.

Indexed as

Plastic surgeryQuality of lifeSexuality

Identifiers

PMID30524177
PMCPMC6244988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.