Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523958›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019

Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Victoria H Fan, Lauren E Grosberg, Sasidhar S Madugula, Pawel Hottowy, Wladyslaw Dabrowski, Alexander Sher, Alan M Litke, E J Chichilnisky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-Fidelity Reproduction of Visual Signals by Electrical Stimulation in the Central Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuromodulation using electroosmosis.Journal of neural engineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Automatic Identification of Axon Bundle Activation for Epiretinal Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria H FanDepartments of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology, and Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-3924
Lauren E GrosbergDepartments of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology, and Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Sasidhar S MadugulaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology, and Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Pawel HottowyFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-2195
Wladyslaw DabrowskiFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-9568
Alexander SherSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America.
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-3642
E J ChichilniskyDepartments of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology, and Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-0248
Stanford University · USAGH University of Krakow · PLUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY019005 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ALBRIGHT, THOMAS D · 2009 to 2018
$7.7M
Patterned Electrical Stimulation of the Retina for High-Resolution ProsthesesR01EY021271 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Patterned electrical stimulation of the retina for the design of prosthesesF32EY025120 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSBERG, LAUREN EMILY · 2015 to 2016
$74k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025120NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019005NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpiretinal prostheses are designed to restore vision in people blinded by photoreceptor degenerative diseases, by directly activating retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) using an electrode array implanted on the retina. In present-day clinical devices, current spread from the stimulating electrode to a distant return electrode often results in the activation of many cells, potentially limiting the quality of artificial vision. In the laboratory, epiretinal activation of RGCs with cellular resolution has been demonstrated with small electrodes, but distant returns may still cause undesirable current spread. Here, the ability of local return stimulation to improve the selective activation of RGCs at cellular resolution was evaluated. APPROACH: A custom multi-electrode array (512 electrodes, 10 μm diameter, 60 μm pitch) was used to simultaneously stimulate and record from RGCs in isolated primate retina. Stimulation near the RGC soma with a single electrode and a distant return was compared to stimulation in which the return was provided by six neighboring electrodes. MAIN

resultsLocal return stimulation enhanced the capability to activate cells near the central electrode (<30 μm) while avoiding cells farther away (>30 μm). This resulted in an improved ability to selectively activate ON and OFF cells, including cells encoding immediately adjacent regions in the visual field. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that a device that restricts the electric field through local returns could optimize activation of neurons at cellular resolution, improving the quality of artificial vision.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual ProsthesisAnimalsBlindnessElectrodes, ImplantedMacaca mulattaNeurodegenerative DiseasesPhotic StimulationPhotoreceptor CellsProsthesis DesignRetinaVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID30523958
PMCPMC6416068
OpenAlexW2952502476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.