ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018
Sensitivity analysis of neurodynamic and electromagnetic simulation parameters for robust prediction of peripheral nerve stimulation.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electric field calculation and peripheral nerve stimulation prediction for head and body gradient coils.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Electromagnetic and Electrophysiological Modeling of Cardiac Stimulation Thresholds in 13 MRI Gradient Systems and 56 Body Models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Simulation of dB/dt-Over-Electric Field Cardiac Magnetostimulation Safety Ratios in 75 Body Models and 18 Gradient Systems.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Initial assessment of PNS safety for interventionalists during image-guided procedures.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Experimental validation of a PNS-optimized whole-body gradient coil.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of peripheral axon geometry and local anatomy on magnetostimulation chronaxie.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Prediction of experimental cardiac magnetostimulation thresholds using pig-specific body models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Measurement of magnetostimulation thresholds in the porcine heart.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Investigating cardiac stimulation limits of MRI gradient coils using electromagnetic and electrophysiological simulations in human and canine body models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Optimization of MRI Gradient Coils With Explicit Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Constraints.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Optimizing selective stimulation of peripheral nerves with arrays of coils or surface electrodes using a linear peripheral nerve stimulation metric.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has become an important limitation for fast MR imaging using the latest gradient hardware. We have recently developed a simulation framework to predict PNS thresholds and stimulation locations in the body for arbitrary coil geometries to inform the gradient coil optimization process. Our approach couples electromagnetic field simulations in realistic body models to a neurodynamic model of peripheral nerve fibers. In this work, we systematically analyze the impact of key parameters on the predicted PNS thresholds to assess the robustness of the simulation results. We analyze the sensitivity of the simulated thresholds to variations of the most important simulation parameters, including parameters of the electromagnetic field simulations (dielectric tissue properties, body model size, position, spatial resolution, and coil model discretization) and parameters of the neurodynamic simulation (length of the simulated nerves, position of the nerve model relative to the extracellular potential, temporal resolution of the nerve membrane dynamics). We found that for the investigated setup, the subject-dependent parameters (e.g. tissue properties or body size) can affect PNS prediction by up to ~26% when varied in a natural range. This is in accordance with the standard deviation of ~30% reported in human subject studies. Parameters related to numerical aspects can cause significant simulation errors (>30%), if not chosen cautiously. However, these perturbations can be controlled to yield errors below 5% for all investigated parameters without an excessive increase in computation time. Our sensitivity analysis shows that patient-specific parameter fluctuations yield PNS threshold variations similar to the variations observed in experimental PNS studies. This may become useful to estimate population-average PNS thresholds and understand their standard deviation. Our analysis indicates that the simulated PNS thresholds are numerically robust, which is important for ranking different MRI gradient coil designs or assessing different PNS mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.