Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523864›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019

Combined head phantom and neural mass model validation of effective connectivity measures.

Steven M Peterson, Daniel P Ferris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven M PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Daniel P Ferris

Funding

Supraspinal Control of Human Locomotor AdaptationR01NS104772 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Daniel P Ferris · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDue to its high temporal resolution, electroencephalography (EEG) has become a promising tool for quantifying cortical dynamics and effective connectivity in a mobile setting. While many connectivity estimators are available, the efficacy of these measures has not been rigorously validated in real-world scenarios. The goal of this study was to quantify the accuracy of independent component analysis and multiple connectivity measures on ground-truth connections while exposed real-world volume conduction and head motion. APPROACH: We collected high-density EEG from a phantom head with embedded antennae, using neural mass models to generate transiently interconnected signals. The head was mounted upon a motion platform that mimicked recorded human head motion at various walking speeds. We used cross-correlation and signal to noise ratio to determine how well independent component analysis recovered the original antenna signals. For connectivity measures, we computed the average and standard deviation across frequency of each estimated connectivity peak. MAIN

resultsIndependent component analysis recovered most antenna signals, as evidenced by cross-correlations primarily above 0.8, and maintained consistent signal to noise ratio values near 10 dB across walking speeds compared to scalp channel data, which had decreased signal to noise ratios of ~2 dB at fast walking speeds. The connectivity measures used were generally able to identify the true interconnections, but some measures were susceptible to spurious high-frequency connections inducing large standard deviations of ~10 Hz. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that independent component analysis and some connectivity measures can be effective at recovering underlying connections among brain areas. These results highlight the utility of validating EEG processing techniques with a combination of complex signals, phantom head use, and realistic head motion.

Indexed as

HeadModels, NeurologicalPhantoms, ImagingArtifactsComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyHumansMotionNeural PathwaysSignal-To-Noise RatioWalking

Identifiers

PMID30523864
PMCPMC6448772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.