Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523774›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Exploring absolute and relative measures of exposure to food environments in relation to dietary patterns among European adults.

Mgm Pinho, J D Mackenbach, J-M Oppert, H Charreire, H Bárdos, H Rutter, S Compernolle, Jwj Beulens, J Brug, J Lakerveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mgm Pinho1Amsterdam UMC,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-0851
J D Mackenbach1Amsterdam UMC,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-721X
J-M Oppert2Sorbonne Université,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Department of Nutrition, Paris,France.
H Charreire3Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle (EREN), Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistiques,Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris 13, Bobigny,France.
H Bárdos5Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health,University of Debrecen,Debrecen,Hungary.
H Rutter6Department of Social and Policy Sciences,University of Bath,Bath,UK.
S Compernolle7Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Jwj Beulens1Amsterdam UMC,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
J Brug1Amsterdam UMC,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
J Lakerveld1Amsterdam UMC,Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the associations of absolute and relative measures of exposure to food retailers with dietary patterns, using simpler and more complex measures.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingUrban regions in Belgium, France, Hungary, the Netherlands and the UK.ParticipantsEuropean adults (n 4942). Supermarkets and local food shops were classified as 'food retailers providing healthier options'; fast-food/takeaway restaurants, cafés/bars and convenience/liquor stores as 'food retailers providing less healthy options'. Simpler exposure measures used were density of healthy and density of less healthy food retailers. More complex exposure measures used were: spatial access (combination of density and proximity) to healthy and less healthy food retailers; density of healthier food retailers relative to all food retailers; and a ratio of spatial access scores to healthier and less healthy food retailers. Outcome measures were a healthy or less healthy dietary pattern derived from a principal component analysis (based on consumption of fruits, vegetables, fish, fast foods, sweets and sweetened beverages).

resultsOnly the highest density of less healthy food retailers was significantly associated with the less healthy dietary pattern (β = -129·6; 95 % CI -224·3, -34·8). None of the other absolute density measures nor any of the relative measures of exposures were associated with dietary patterns.

conclusionsMore complex measures of exposure to food retailers did not produce stronger associations with dietary patterns. We had some indication that absolute and relative measures of exposure assess different aspects of the food environment. However, given the lack of significant findings, this needs to be further explored.

Indexed as

CommerceCross-Sectional StudiesDietEuropeFemaleFood SupplyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRestaurantsDietary patternsEuropean adultsExposureFood environmentRelative/absolute measures

Identifiers

PMID30523774
PMCPMC6536821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.