Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523709›Full record

GuidelineJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Initial Diagnostic Work-Up of Acute Leukemia: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists and American Society of Hematology Guideline.

Valérie de Haas, Nofisat Ismaila, Anjali Advani, Daniel A Arber, Raetasha S Dabney, Dipti Patel-Donelly, Elizabeth Kitlas, Rob Pieters, Ching-Hon Pui, Kendra Sweet and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Valérie de Haas1 Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nofisat Ismaila2 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
Anjali Advani3 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Daniel A Arber4 University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Raetasha S Dabney5 Keesler Medical Center, Ocean Springs, MS.
Dipti Patel-Donelly6 Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA.
Elizabeth Kitlas7 The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY.
Rob Pieters1 Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ching-Hon Pui8 St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Kendra Sweet9 Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Ling Zhang9 Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USPrincess Máxima Center · NLAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology · USCleveland Clinic · USKeesler Medical Center · USLeukemia and Lymphoma Society · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USVirginia Cancer Specialists · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) developed an evidence-based guideline on the initial diagnostic work-up of acute leukemia (AL). Because of the relevance of this topic to the ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline and applied a set of procedures and policies for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations.

methodsThe CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. Then, an ASCO Endorsement Expert Panel updated the literature search and reviewed the content and recommendations.

resultsThe ASCO Expert Panel determined that the recommendations from the guideline, published in 2016, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO fully endorsed the CAP-ASH guideline on initial diagnostic work-up of AL and included some discussion points according to clinical practice and updated literature.

conclusionTwenty-seven guideline statements were reviewed. Some discussion points were included to better assess CNS involvement in leukemia and to provide novel insights into molecular diagnosis and potential markers for risk stratification and target therapy. These discussions are categorized into four sections: (1) initial diagnosis focusing on basic diagnostics and determination of risk parameters, (2) molecular markers and minimal residual disease detection, (3) context of referral to another institution with expertise in the management of AL, and (4) reporting and record keeping for better outlining and follow-up discussion. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/hematologic-malignancies-guidelines .

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseHematologyHumansLeukemiaPathology

Identifiers

PMID30523709
PMCPMC6338392
OpenAlexW2902102813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.