Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523548›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Vis-à-vis: a focus on genetic features of cerebral cavernous malformations and brain arteriovenous malformations pathogenesis.

Concetta Scimone, Luigi Donato, Silvia Marino, Concetta Alafaci, Rosalia D'Angelo, Antonina Sidoti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification of a novel de novo mutation in the CTNNB1 gene in an Iranian patient with intellectual disability.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Concetta ScimoneDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Consolare Valeria street 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Luigi DonatoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Consolare Valeria street 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Silvia MarinoIRCSS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", c.da Casazza, Messina, Italy.
Concetta AlafaciDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Consolare Valeria street 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Rosalia D'AngeloDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Consolare Valeria street 1, 98125, Messina, Italy. rdangelo@unime.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-3121
Antonina SidotiDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Consolare Valeria street 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrovascular malformations include a wide range of blood vessel disorders affecting brain vasculature. Neuroimaging differential diagnosis can result unspecific due to similar phenotypes of lesions and their deep localization. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms simultaneously analyze several hundreds of genes and can be applied for molecular distinction of different phenotypes within the same disorder's macro-area. We discuss about the main criticisms regarding molecular bases of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) and brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM), highlighting both common pathogenic aspects and genetic differences leading to lesion development. Many recent studies performed on human CCM and AVM tissues aim to detect genetic markers to better understand molecular bases and pathogenic mechanism, particularly for sporadic cases. Several genes involved in angiogenesis show different expression patterns between CCM and AVM, and these could represent a valid starting point to project a NGS panel to apply for differential cerebrovascular malformation diagnosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsHemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous SystemHumansIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsArteriovenous malformationsCerebral cavernous malformationsDifferential molecular diagnosisGenetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.