Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523535›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2019

Availability of legalized cannabis reduces demand for illegal cannabis among Canadian cannabis users: evidence from a behavioural economic substitution paradigm.

Michael Amlung, James MacKillop

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review and meta-analysis of delay discounting and cannabis use.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. How tax structures for retail cannabis shape cannabis use among youth and young adults: evidence from a volumetric choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cannabis demand and use among veterans: A prospective examination.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reliability of an adaptive marijuana purchase task.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael AmlungPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th St, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada. amlungm@mcmaster.ca.
James MacKillopPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th St, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of cannabis legalization, an important question among clinicians, policymakers, and the public is whether availability of legal cannabis will significantly reduce consumption (demand) of illegal cannabis. Using paradigms from behavioural economics, we tested the prediction that legal cannabis would be an asymmetrical substitute for illegal cannabis, with legal cannabis operating as a superior commodity based on its regulated status. In a sample of 289 adult cannabis users in Ontario, we found evidence of substitutability for both legal and illegal cannabis, but significantly lower substitutability of illegal for legal cannabis, a pattern that was also present for price elasticity (α) and P

Indexed as

CannabisLegislation, DrugAdultCommerceEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsMaleMarijuana UseOntarioIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID30523535
PMCPMC6964395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.