Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30523484›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019

Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P's Plus Screener.

Emmanuel A Oga, Erica N Peters, Katrina Mark, Kathleen Trocin, Victoria H Coleman-Cowger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emmanuel A OgaResearch Triangle Institute, 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 900, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA. imanueloga@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-5681
Erica N PetersBattelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katrina MarkUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen TrocinBattelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Victoria H Coleman-CowgerBattelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Comparison of Substance Use Screeners in Assessing Prescription Drug Abuse and Other Illicit Drug Use among Pregnant WomenR01DA041328 · NIDA · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI COLEMAN-COWGER, VICTORIA HOPE · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041328NIDA NIH HHS R01DA041328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P's Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P's Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification. Methods A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P's Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P's Plus used as designed, and to the 4P's Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification. Results Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)]. Conclusions for Practice Sensitivity of the 4P's Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdolescentAdultChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansParentsPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal DiagnosisSelf ReportSubstance-Related Disorders4P’s PlusDrug useParentPartnerPregnancyPrenatalSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID30523484
PMCPMC7325307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.