ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019
The growing discrepancy between resident training in colonic surgery and the rising number of general surgery graduates.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching residents in emergency surgery for acute bowel obstruction-is supervised surgery safe and feasible? A retrospective single-center analysis from a MIS-specialized hospital.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Identifying technical skills and clinical procedures in surgery for a simulation-based curriculum: a national general needs assessment.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Evolution of the Surgical Residency System in Switzerland: An In-Depth Analysis Over 15 Years.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Training in endocrine surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe decrease in resident operative experience due to working-hour directives and sub-specialization within general surgery is the subject of growing debate. This study aims to examine how the numbers of colectomies used for resident training have evolved since the introduction of working-hour directives and to place these results within the context of the number of new general surgeons.
methodsBased on the nationwide database of the Swiss association for quality management in surgery, all segmental colectomies performed at 86 centers were analyzed according to the presence or absence of residents and compared to national numbers of surgical graduates.
resultsOf 19,485 segmental colectomies between 2006 and 2015, 36% were used for training purposes. Residents performed 4%, junior staff surgeons 31%, senior staff surgeons 55%, and private surgeons 10%. The percentage performed by residents decreased significantly, while the annual number of graduates increased from 36 to 79. Multivariate analysis identified statutory (non-private) health insurance (OR 7.6, CI 4.6-12.5), right colon resection (OR 3.5, CI 2.5-4.7), tertiary referral center (OR 1.9, CI 1.5-2.6), emergency surgery (OR 1.7, CI 1.3-2.3), and earlier date of surgery (OR 1.1, CI 1.0-1.1) as predictors for resident involvement.
conclusionsOnly a low and declining percentage of colectomies is used for resident training, despite growing numbers of trainees. These data imply that opportunities to obtain technical proficiency have diminished since the implementation of working-hour directives, indicating the need to better utilize suitable teaching opportunities, to ensure that technical proficiency remains high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30523397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.