ArticleBMC medical ethics2018
Exploring the ethics of global health research priority-setting.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the Unfairness of the 'Fair-share Principle' for Health Research.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- Return of health research findings in Nigeria-perspective of potential research participants.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- WHO's criteria for ethical health research priority-setting in the context of climate change.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
- Applying Community Engagement Methods to Facilitate Global Co‑Learning among Indigenous Communities.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Return of health research findings in Nigeria-perspective of potential research participants.Research square · 2025Article
- Clinical Data Flow in Botswana Clinics: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Assessment.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Framing rehabilitation through health policy and systems research: priorities for strengthening rehabilitation.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships.Anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Tales of treatment and new perspectives for global health research on antimicrobial resistance.Medical humanities · 2021Article
- HIV prevention research and COVID-19: putting ethics guidance to the test.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- COVID-19 Pandemic Prompts a Paradigm Shift in Global Emergency Medicine: Multidirectional Education and Remote Collaboration.AEM education and training · 2021Article
- Setting a research agenda to improve community health: An inclusive mixed-methods approach in Northern Uganda.PloS one · 2021Article
- Health Outcome Prioritization in Alzheimer's Disease: Understanding the Ethical Landscape.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Review
- Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThus far, little work in bioethics has specifically focused on global health research priority-setting. Yet features of global health research priority-setting raise ethical considerations and concerns related to health justice. For example, such processes are often exclusively disease-driven, meaning they rely heavily on burden of disease considerations. They, therefore, tend to undervalue non-biomedical research topics, which have been identified as essential to helping reduce health disparities. In recognition of these ethical concerns and the limited scholarship and dialogue addressing them, we convened an international workshop in September 2015. The workshop aimed to initiate discussion on the appropriate relationship between global and national levels of health research priority-setting and to begin exploring what might be ethically required for priority-setting at each of those levels. MAIN TEXT: This paper comprises our reflections following the workshop. Its main objective is to launch a research agenda for the ethics of global health research priority-setting. We identify three domains of global health research priority-setting-scope, underlying values and substantive requirements, and procedural considerations. For each domain, specific research questions are highlighted and why they need to be explored is explained. Some preliminary thoughts and normative arguments as to how the research questions might be answered are also offered. For example, we provide initial ideas about the appropriate relationship between different priority-setting levels and what values and substantive considerations should guide or underpin global health research priority-setting as a matter of justice.
conclusionWe anticipate that framing a new research agenda for the ethics of global health research priority-setting will spur ethicists, researchers, and policymakers to refocus their efforts on developing more rigorous and ethically sound approaches to priority-setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.