Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30522484›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2018

Results from a proactive follow-up intervention to improve linkage and retention among people living with HIV in Uganda: a pre-/post- study.

Caroline E Boeke, Vennie Nabitaka, Andrea Rowan, Katherine Guerra, Pamela Nawaggi, Vivienne Mulema, Victor Bigira, Eleanor Magongo, Patricia Mucheri, Andrew Musoke and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caroline E BoekeClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), 383 Dorchester Road, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02127, USA. cboeke@clintonhealthaccess.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-1307
Vennie NabitakaCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrea RowanCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Katherine GuerraClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), 383 Dorchester Road, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
Pamela NawaggiCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Vivienne MulemaCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Victor BigiraCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Eleanor MagongoMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Patricia MucheriCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew MusokeCHAI, Kampala, Uganda.
Cordelia KatureebeMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Department for International Development 202575-105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite gains in HIV testing and treatment access in sub-Saharan Africa, patient attrition from care remains a problem. Evidence is needed of real-world implementation of low-cost, scalable, and sustainable solutions to reduce attrition. We hypothesized that more proactive patient follow-up and enhanced counseling by health facilities would improve patient linkage and retention.

methodsAt 20 health facilities in Central Uganda, we implemented a quality of care improvement intervention package that included training lay health workers in best practices for patient follow-up and counseling, including improved appointment recordkeeping, phone calls and home visits to lost patients, and enhanced adherence counseling strategies; and strengthening oversight of these processes. We compared patient linkage to and retention in HIV care in the 9 months before implementation of the intervention to the 9 months after implementation. Data were obtained from facility-based registers and files and analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsAmong 1900 patients testing HIV-positive during the study period, there was not a statistically significant increase in linkage to care after implementing the intervention (52.9% versus 54.9%, p = 0.63). However, among 1356 patients initiating antiretroviral therapy during the follow-up period, there were statistically significant increases in patient adherence to appointment schedules (44.5% versus 55.2%, p = 0.01) after the intervention. There was a small increase in Ministry of Health-defined retention in care (71.7% versus 75.7%, p = 0.12); when data from the period of intervention ramp-up was dropped, this increase became statistically significant (71.7% versus 77.6%, p = 0.01). The increase in retention was more dramatic for patients under age 19 years (N = 84; 64.0% versus 83.9%, p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient retained in care was $47.

conclusionsImproving patient tracking and counseling practices was relatively low cost and enhanced patient retention in care, particularly for pediatric and adolescent patients. This approach should be considered for scale-up in Uganda and elsewhere. However, no impact was seen in improved patient linkage to care with this proactive follow-up intervention.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trial Registry #PACTR201611001756166 . Registered August 31, 2016.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAppointments and SchedulesControlled Before-After StudiesCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth FacilitiesHIV InfectionsHouse CallsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMedication AdherencePatient ComplianceRetrospective StudiesAfricaFollow-upLinkage to careQuality of careRetention in careUganda

Identifiers

PMID30522484
PMCPMC6282267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.