Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30522481›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2018

Delivering postpartum family planning services in Nepal: are providers supportive?

Mahesh C Puri, Manju Maharjan, Erin Pearson, Elina Pradhan, Yasaswi Dhungel, Aayush Khadka, Iqbal H Shah

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Family Planning Uptake in Kagera and Mara Regions in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Community Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Experiences of women, men and healthcare workers accessing family planning services in Malawi: A grounded theory.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahesh C PuriCenter for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal. mahesh@crehpa.org.np.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-1480
Manju MaharjanCenter for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Erin PearsonIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Elina PradhanThe World Bank Group, D, Washington, C, USA.
Yasaswi DhungelCenter for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Aayush KhadkaHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Iqbal H ShahHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth service providers play a key role in addressing women's need for pregnancy prevention, especially during the postpartum period. Yet, in Nepal, little is known about their views on providing postpartum family planning (PPFP) services and postpartum contraceptive methods such as immediate postpartum intra-uterine devices (PPIUD). This paper explores the perspectives of different types of providers on PPFP including PPIUD, their confidence in providing PPFP services, and their willingness to share their knowledge and skills with colleagues after receiving PPFP and PPIUD training.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 14 obstetricians/gynecologists and nurses from six tertiary level public hospitals in Nepal after they received PPFP and PPIUD training as part of an intervention aimed at integrating PPFP counseling and insertion into routine maternity care services. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic approach.

resultsProviders identified several advantages of PPFP, supported the provision of such services, and were willing to transfer their newly acquired skills to colleagues in other facilities who had not received PPFP and PPIUD training. However, many providers identified several supply-side and training-related barriers to providing high quality PPFP services, such as, (i) lack of adequate human resources, particularly a FP counselor; (ii) work overload; (iii) lack of private space for counseling; (iv) lack of IUDs and information, education and counseling materials; and (v) lack of support from hospital management.

conclusionsProviders appeared to be motivated to deliver quality PPFP services and transfer their knowledge to colleagues but identified several barriers which prevented them from doing so. Future efforts to improve provision of quality PPFP services should address the barriers identified by providers.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude to HealthContraceptionCounselingCounselorsDelivery of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesFemaleGynecologyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, PublicHumansIntrauterine DevicesMotivationNepalObstetricsIntra-uterine device (IUD)NepalPostpartum family planningService providersSupply-side barriers

Identifiers

PMID30522481
PMCPMC6282334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.