Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30522473›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2018

National survey: current prevalence and characteristics of home mechanical ventilation in Hungary.

Luca Valko, Szabolcs Baglyas, Janos Gal, Andras Lorx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of telemonitoring in patients on home mechanical ventilation.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Patient's Perspective Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca ValkoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1082 Üllői út 78B, Budapest, Hungary. valko.luca@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-4681
Szabolcs BaglyasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1082 Üllői út 78B, Budapest, Hungary.
Janos GalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1082 Üllői út 78B, Budapest, Hungary.
Andras LorxDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1082 Üllői út 78B, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome mechanical ventilation is an established treatment for chronic respiratory failure resulting in improved survival and quality of life. Technological advancement, evolving health care reimbursement systems and newly implemented national guidelines result in increased utilization worldwide. Prevalence shows great geographical variations and data on East-Central European practice has been scarce to date. The aim of the current study was to evaluate prevalence and characteristics of home mechanical ventilation in Hungary.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide study using an online survey focusing on patients receiving ventilatory support at home. The survey focused on characterization of the site (affiliation, type), experience with home mechanical ventilation, number of patients treated, indication for home mechanical ventilation (disease type), description of home mechanical ventilation (invasive/noninvasive, ventilation hours, duration of ventilation) and description of the care provided (type of follow up visits, hospitalization need, reimbursement).

resultsOur survey uncovered a total of 384 patients amounting to a prevalence of 3.9/100,000 in Hungary. 10.4% of patients received invasive, while 89.6% received noninvasive ventilation. The most frequent diagnosis was central hypopnea syndromes (60%), while pulmonary (20%), neuromuscular (11%) and chest wall disorders (7%) were less frequent indications. Daily ventilation need was less than 8 h in 74.2%, between 8 and 16 h in 15.4% and more than 16 h in 10.4% of patients reported. When comparing sites with a limited (< 50 patients) versus substantial (> 50 patients) case number, we found the former had significantly higher ratio of neuromuscular conditions, were more likely to ventilate invasively, with more than 16 h/day ventilation need and were more likely to provide home visits and readmit patients (p < 0,001).

conclusionsOur results show a reasonable current estimate and characterization of home mechanical ventilation practice in Hungary. Although a growing practice can be assumed, current prevalence is still markedly reduced compared to international data reported, the duality of current data hinting to a possible gap in diagnosis and care for more dependent patients. This points to the importance of establishing home mechanical ventilation centers, where increased experience will enable state of the art care to more dependent patients as well, increasing overall prevalence.

Indexed as

AftercareHome Care ServicesRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyAdultAgedChildChronic DiseaseFemaleHospitalizationHumansHungaryMaleNeeds AssessmentPrevalenceQuality ImprovementChronic respiratory failureHome careHome mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID30522473
PMCPMC6282340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.